English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-05 12:44:54 · 3 answers · asked by Rosemary A 1 in Education & Reference Words & Wordplay

3 answers

Check here:

fac-staff.seattleu.edu/kschlnoe/web/TLU/process.html

2007-09-05 12:57:18 · answer #1 · answered by Frosty 7 · 0 0

Liberal - Technically, somebody who falls to the left in a political equipment, who believes in government classes (healthcare, cap & commerce are stable examples, as is welfare) and a greater scope of government, additionally favors monitoring of company. somebody who believes that the federal government could have greater importance than state government. Liberals tend to be prepared on the rights of the oppressed and unlucky. increasing taxes to greater government agendas. Conservatives many times prefer a time-honored viewpoint on ethical themes and fall to the excellent with political ideals. Conservatives have confidence in self prospering, constrained volume of government administration over the individuals. they have confidence human beings could be waiting to make judgements for themselves and not be constrained via what government believes is stable for "the better stable". have confidence in following the form heavily and giving the individuals many liberties. traditionally are Christian professional existence and anti gay marriage. In less complicated words.. Liberals have confidence all of us on the decrease type and backside could be lifted up and given many handouts and favors.. on a similar time as the rich greater type could be dragged right down to the middle levels to help even out the variety.. Conservatives have confidence that this government help is senseless and that individuals become based on the handouts ..and without those handouts human beings can prosper on their very own with self motivation and individual success

2016-10-10 00:55:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Concept mapping is a technique for visualizing the relationships among different concepts. A concept map is a diagram showing the relationships among concepts. Concepts are connected with labelled arrows, in a downward-branching hierarchical structure. The relationship between concepts is articulated in linking phrases, e.g., "gives rise to", "results in", "is required by," or "contributes to".

Development
The technique of concept mapping was developed by Joseph D. Novak[1][2] and his research team at Cornell University in the 1970s as a means of representing the emerging science knowledge of students. It has subsequently been used as a tool to increase meaningful learning in the sciences and other subjects as well as to represent the expert knowledge of individuals and teams in education, government and business.

Concept maps have their origin in the learning movement called constructivism. In particular, constructivists hold that learners actively construct knowledge.

Novak's work is based on the cognitive theories of David Ausubel (assimilation theory), who stressed the importance of prior knowledge in being able to learn new concepts.

"The most important single factor influencing learning is what the learner already knows. Ascertain this and teach accordingly."[3]
Novak taught students as young as six years old to make concept maps to represent their response to focus questions such as "What is water?" "What causes the seasons?

In his book Learning How to Learn, Novak states that "meaningful learning involves the assimilation of new concepts and propositions into existing cognitive structures."

[edit] Usage
Concept maps are used to stimulate the generation of ideas, and are believed to aid creativity. For example, concept mapping is sometimes used for brain-storming. Although they are often personalized and idiosyncratic, concept maps can be used to communicate complex ideas.

Formalized concept maps are used in software design, where a common usage is Unified Modeling Language diagramming amongst similar conventions and development methodologies.

Concept mapping can also be seen as a first step in ontology-building, and can also be used flexibly to represent formal argument.

Concept maps are widely used in education and business for:

Note taking and summarizing gleaning key concepts, their relationships and hierarchy from documents and source materials
New knowledge creation: e.g., transforming tacit knowledge into an organizational resource, mapping team knowledge
Institutional knowledge preservation (retention), e.g, eliciting and mapping expert knowledge of employees prior to retirement
Collaborative knowledge modeling and the transfer of expert knowledge
Facilitating the creation of shared vision and shared understanding within a team or organization
Instructional design: concept maps used as Ausubelian "advance organizers" which provide an initial conceptual frame for subsequent information and learning.
Training: concept maps used as Ausubelian "advanced organizers" to represent the training context and its relationship to their jobs, to the organization's strategic objectives, to training goals.
Increasing meaningful learning:
Communicating complex ideas and arguments:
Examining the symmetry of complex ideas and arguments and associated terminology:
Detailing the entire structure of an idea, train of thought, or line of argument (with the specific goal of exposing faults, errors, or gaps in one's own reasoning) for the scrutiny of others.
Enhancing metacognition (learning to learn, and thinking about knowledge)
Improving language ability
Assessing learner understanding of learning objectives, concepts, and the relationship among those concepts

[edit] Contrast with mind mapping
Concept mapping can be contrasted with the similar idea of idea mapping.

The latter is often restricted to radial hierarchies and tree structures. Among the various schema and techniques for visualizing ideas, processes, organisations, concept mapping, as developed by Novak is unique in philosophical basis, which "makes concepts, and propositions composed of concepts, the central elements in the structure of knowledge and construction of meaning."[4]

There is research evidence that knowledge is stored in the brain in the form of productions that act on declarative memory content which is also referred to as chunks or propositions [5][6]. Because concept maps are constructed to reflect the organization of the declarative memory system, they facilitate sense-making and meaningful learning on the part of individuals who make concept maps and those who use them.

Concept maps were developed to enhance meaningful learning in the sciences. A well made concept map grows within a context frame defined by an explicit "focus question," while a mind map has branches radiating out from a central picture.

Another contrast between Concept mapping and Mind mapping is the speed and spontaneity when a Mind map is created. A Mind map reflects what you think about a single topic, which can focus group brainstorming. A Concept map can be a map, a system view, of a real (abstract) system or set of concepts. Concept maps are more free form, as multiple hubs and clusters can be created, unlike mindmaps which fix on a single conceptual center.

2007-09-05 13:04:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers