2007-09-05 12:35:08 · 43 answers · asked by Living_Legend 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
how come not being able to speak is never in these types of things...i would choose that over the others...
but for ur question i have no freakin' clue i guess deaf
2007-09-05 12:38:20 · answer #1 · answered by ☠Rockerchick☠ 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Deaf, Deafiantly
2007-09-05 12:37:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Deaf
2007-09-05 12:37:36 · answer #3 · answered by redman656565 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Deaf. I could handle not hearing better than I could not seeing. And I already am able to somewhat read lips, so I would probably be less traumatized if I went deaf then if I went blind.
2007-09-05 12:39:46 · answer #4 · answered by Lady M 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd rather be deaf and see things around me. At least I can still learn how to do sign language and stuff and if your blind, you won't be able to see the beautiful things around you anymore though you can hear those people around you...
2007-09-05 12:39:14 · answer #5 · answered by GQ19 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
deaf cuz if i were deaf i could still see and write notes and stuff where if i was blind i might get in accidents when crossing the street or something else terrible might happen.
2007-09-05 12:40:19 · answer #6 · answered by Hunny b 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Deaf. If I couldn't look at T N' A and read life would be meaningless.
2007-09-05 12:40:17 · answer #7 · answered by Dreams 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither but to choose one i would rather be deaf, because I love to look at rocks!
2007-09-05 12:38:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would choose deaf, if you are blind you cant lip read can you, my dad used to lip read, he was amazing at it, in fact it was hard to believe at times he was deaf.
2007-09-05 12:38:43 · answer #9 · answered by itsjustme 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course neither, but if I HAD to choose, I'd rather be deaf.
2007-09-05 12:38:17 · answer #10 · answered by ~Josie~ 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋