Why don't you give the babies that you kill a CHOICE? Ever thought of that? Ya'll are PRO-choice, right?
2007-09-05 11:35:48 · 25 answers · asked by jesusfreak1131 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Just something to say to gabykawa who thinks he is the only one who know about the Bible. Did you know the Bible says that we as Christians are responsible for the sins of others if we don't tell them that what they are doing is wrong. And why cant yall think ahead while you lay down with a person that hmm, maybe I might get pregnat. Go ahead and murder. I told you it is wrong. Did you know that in the US you are not aloud to kill an unborn eagle, but you can kill an unborn baby. Since when eagles more important than humans??????
2007-09-06 07:01:53 · update #1
Sure - as soon as a fertilized egg can learn how to talk, then we'll get right on it ;);););)
2007-09-05 11:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by kr_toronto 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Do you really WANT the babies that are unwanted and who are not adopted to go through the shear hell that their childhood will bring? How about the ones who have to stay with their own parents and are maltreated because they are not wanted? You read about the ones who are chained in the basement and are left in their own feces, The ones who are beaten to death, the ones who are starved to death and so on! I would rather the mothers had chosen abortion instead of the slow miserable deaths.
Obviously the mothers had the option of putting the child up for adoption but for whatever reason they didn't do it. This is not a perfect world. These babies had no choice either.
2007-09-05 18:53:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you. It says something when the woman in Roe v. Wade is now pro-life. Murder is murder, the person above that was talking about Jesus forgot that one (gabykawa). And as far as welfare, if people educated themselves instead of laying down......maybe so many unwanted babies would not be born. I wonder how many posters actually even have children...I also wonder why there is no responsibility for the action of having sex...
2007-09-05 19:31:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is no baby that can make a choice.
People make choices for babies all the time, should that stop?
We can argue about that all day long.
But what exactly are YOU doing other than coming here and asking questions ike this? Or wasting your time trying to overturn Roe vs. Wade?
Are you fighting to the ALL health insurance companies to pay for ALL birth control options, like they pay for Viagra?
Are you out there trying to get the networks to advertise condoms, like they advertise Viagra and ED solutions?
Are you out there talking to the kids and telling them don't have sex and then walking away from them assuming they will listen to you and will do exactly what you say? Or are you giving them all the options?
Are you out there telling men that maybe they need take some responsibility for their actions as well? I mean, it does take 2 to tango here.
2007-09-05 19:05:30 · answer #4 · answered by midnight&moonlight'smom 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Like the existance of God, the "personhood" of a fetus can be neither proven nor disproven. We KNOW that a woman is a person with rights, but the "personhood" of a fetus is pure conjecture. If you are so concerned about the survival of every single fertilized ovum, then what are you doing to prevent the "spontaneous" abortions that occur when women of childbearing age are physically active? Would you support a sort of "welfare" to allow all such women to avoid physical work, so as to "save the lives" of these "babies" at risk?
2007-09-05 18:47:39 · answer #5 · answered by kill_yr_television 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Pro choice means that the woman has the choice. Not me, not you.
I guess that you're a Jesus freak, I mean, you're name is Jesusfreak.
Jesus clearly said that he doesn't like people pointing at others' sins. He said (and was adamant about it) that you should care for your own sins. It's in the Bible, maybe you've heard about it. It's a book that you don't seem to have read.
If you're a Jesus freak, I recommend you to take a look at it. There's a lot of stuff about him.
2007-09-05 18:51:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
i truly got a kick out of these answers espeially the ones that truthfully state that this makes no sense and you belong in an institution (good one, guys) and it looks like your striving for conflict by like asking such a question in such an abrasive way.
I don't know which side i stand on the issue, due to being 14, but I can honestly say I have the maturity not to post a "question" that you know is only going to attract insults instead of answers.
So here you go, an insult.
2007-09-05 19:58:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I've never been pregnant. Can't give something a choice if it doesn't exist to express itself. As far as abortion is concerned. It's a non-issue. Are you willing to pay for the welfare that it will take to care for all those children to grow up when they are born to unwed and poor mothers? Are you willing to pay for the child care services that it will take if women are forced to have kids? What are you willing to sacrifice? Are you willing to adopt millions of babies yourself? Or, are you willing to feed them, clothe them or put them through school? Are you willing to sacrifice the quality of life your own children will have to sacrifice to make room for billions of babies around the world that will take up so much space and resources that it will pretty much wipe out the planet? Are you? I'm not. And, it's not your choice to make, it's still the woman's who have to care for it. You don't like it? Keep your dick in your pants.
2007-09-05 18:45:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
You really have to wonder about the hypocrisy of the liberal. A heart beat and brain waves are the universal sign for life globally. Absecence of the heartbeat & brainwaves are the universal determiner of death, globally. A baby in the womb has both. Notice the liberals who will not call it a baby at all.....Murder is murder, regardless of how sterile you try nad make it appear.
2007-09-05 18:56:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
Ya pro choice for the women. Get off your high horse. You probably support giving birth. But have a problem with welfare taking care of the babies that are brought into this world. Its better to let a child and its mother starve or live on the streets? Besides who are you to tell someone what to do with their body or their child. Worry about yourself!
2007-09-05 18:41:41 · answer #10 · answered by Kellie 5 · 8⤊ 5⤋
Perhaps Yahoo Answers is the wrong venue for you. Have you ever tried committing yourself to an institution? They may be able to help you.
2007-09-05 18:43:47 · answer #11 · answered by Dan 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋