With huge amounts of Russian and Eastern European tennis players coming through, several of them winning or else "destined" to win big tournaments and slams should there be a Russian or E.European slam?
After all there has to be a big tennis following in those countries, and if i can stereotype some of the residents of those countries may not be able to support thier home players in forign countries.
Especially also considering a depleted British following and a lack of exceptional tallent coming through in the countries whihc host the slams (especially Australia and France!) Is it time we add another one, another aspect!
And if so what surface would you choose. Clay? I guess not. And do we ant to see anymore slams on hard courts? So should be have another grass tournemtn? I guess in Russia no!
So should they be more adventurous? Should it be played indoors? On carpet (or rubber) surfaces, or else on a suspended court or even, maybe, on wood?
2007-09-05 11:18:39 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Tennis
that's not enough of a reason to have a slam there.
where the good players come from has nothing to do with where the slams are held.
how many good players come from nyc (mcenroe aside)?
according to your logic, there should be a slam in florida and california.
the slams are where they are.
not to date myself, but when i grew up, you could see tennis on tv nearly every weekend of the summer.
there ARE important tennis tournaments taking place every week of the year.
you would never know it because americans just don't care about tennis anymore.
tennis - the greatest game no one cares about...
2007-09-05 11:48:30 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
there should be a china slam indoor courts
2007-09-05 11:27:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh, French Open? :)
2007-09-05 11:34:19 · answer #3 · answered by Sandy ♥ - semi retired :) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋