& healthj care wouldn't we eventually drastically reduce the crime rate in this country ( U S A )?I propose that we elimanate white collar & bule collar prison just have prison & thats all.then the better educated people become the less likely they would commit a crime & get thrown into prison we have a systtem based on constitution but if have commit a crime & are convicted you loose all those priviliges.As long as we keep going like we are we will end up with more criminals,richer lawyers,and poorer taxpayers and illiterate society.so dont complain when this country ends up being ran by people such Mark Foley,Larry Craig,Mike Nifon and the list is endless.Its a big game and the taxpayer foots the entire bill.
2007-09-05 09:38:29 · 6 answers · asked by nursegoodbody 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Spending more on Education does not mean we will educate. Take a look at New York State. The Teachers Union gets 80% of the total budget, so if you want to give kids books you have to give the teachers raises (and that means an increase to their pension as well...it's part of the contract). It's all a big political nightmare that the Liberals use to gain the Union vote. Meanwhile, the children get 20% (including the building). It's the truth that Democrats hate for you to know.
Anyway, public education stinks. Any time the government run anything it stinks. Just look at your ability to communicate, and there is the proof.
2007-09-05 09:55:40 · answer #1 · answered by Stereotypemebecauseyouknow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
distinction of opinion. I believe them with banks rather with FDIC and the present Federal Reserve, although commercially working them, no. reason the purpose of the government is rarely if ever profitability. Profitability creates a call for for performance. As for well being care, human beings choose the government to run it in the event that they at the instant have little insurance or none in any respect and function little hazard of having it. this type somebody else will foot the bill for them. Inefficiency does not count in case you are the only taking advantage of it. additionally all human beings is customarily not knowledgeable in economics, the media isn't solid at day trip government extra or inefficiency. human beings do not think of previous the on the spot question of could loose well being care be advantageous for you? and a few human beings have faith that the government is the final resource for those issues reason they are going to be the main honest and actually available.
2016-11-14 07:01:35 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the government cuts funding to healthcare in order to increase funding for healthcare then I will be even more confused that I already am.
How about the government cuts social programs in general and sends people back to work. Maybe we wouldn't have an immigration surplus if our "poor" didn't get a free ride.
2007-09-05 09:48:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
LOL - For someone ranting about the need for more education, your writing is horrible.
You can't just cut back money for public defenders. That would be denying people their constitutional right to an attorney.
2007-09-05 09:52:45 · answer #4 · answered by Michael C 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the different prison levels are commensurate with the different crime. should someone that forges a check be placed in a cell with a murderer or rapist? reduce the sentences for petty drug charges and the prision population will go down and money will be available for social programs and education
2007-09-05 09:43:35 · answer #5 · answered by Dave G 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
OK, that makes absolutely NO sense...but an interesting read.
2007-09-05 09:42:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋