Why.
2007-09-05 09:05:04 · 11 answers · asked by evoandojo 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I gotta go Pam...Anna looks like a mack truck hit her face and does not have friendly eyes...Pam sure she's fake and all but at least she had the decency to get work done on herself!
2007-09-05 09:37:30 · answer #1 · answered by Yummy♥Mummy 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anna
2007-09-05 09:10:16 · answer #2 · answered by c 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jessica Biel has the appropriate physique. distinct 2 are skinny at an same time as Biel is thick and voluptous yet despite the fact that if toned. in spite of the actuality that distinct 2 are prettier. Alba and Simpsom are very appropriate. Biel is certainly eye-catching (like comparing Jennifer Aniston to Angelina Jolie; Jolie is a knock out at an same time as Jenn is certainly eye-catching) Alba in all likelihood be slighlty better appropriate. Simpson is an in intensity 2d. I want i could placed Alba's face on Biel's physique. appropriate woman!!! For understand i bypass to vote Jessica Simpson. She has the appropriate blend of attractiveness & physique. Drew
2016-12-31 13:40:59 · answer #3 · answered by takako 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anna. All her parts are real. Plus, I think she is just plain ol' better looking. Pam never did anything for me.
Pam Anderson kinda looks like a blowup doll.
2007-09-05 09:10:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anna Kournikova is hotter cause she is actually beautiful looking
Pamela Anderson only has big *****........
2007-09-05 09:24:17 · answer #5 · answered by PRINCEUPP 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anna Kournikova, I like that she's all natural
2007-09-05 09:56:22 · answer #6 · answered by Sadie &hearts 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
pam anderson duhhhh
2007-09-07 11:09:32 · answer #7 · answered by greg g 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pam is fake!
2007-09-05 09:36:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
anna is hotter
2007-09-05 09:33:44 · answer #9 · answered by lilmissyin 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
anna kournikova.i know,i'm a gal and i'm not supposed to answer this question.pam is fake.hair,boobs,everything.why would anybody want that??yuck!
2007-09-05 09:09:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋