Investigation is under way into how a nuclear weapon was mistakenly loaded on to a B52 and went from North Dakota to Louisiana.
How will Liberals make the connection to Bush?
Either the most logical or most amusing answer will get 10 Points.
Readyyyyy go!
2007-09-05 08:41:40 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/05/loose.nukes/
2007-09-05 08:43:07 · update #1
Wow, you guys are good! And fast too.
This is going to be a tough choice.
2007-09-05 08:52:57 · update #2
Holy Moly Lundstroms2004 is schooling you guys. C'mon, plenty of time for edits
2007-09-05 08:58:43 · update #3
George Bush was dissatisified with the destruction he caused to New Orleans. He did not kill near enough blacks with his hurricane gun, which is on loan to the Skull and Bones, who got it from the Illuminated Seers of Bavaria, who stole it from aliens at Roswel.
Therefore, since the hurricane and damn explosions did not kill enough black people, he instead wanted to nuke them. Not only could he kill blacks, but he could also in the process launch another attack on the USA, just like he did with the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and blame it again on Al Queda.
Some stupid clap trap like that I bet.
2007-09-05 08:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
From Booman Tribune 09/06/07:
U.S. Staging Nukes for Iran?
By Larry Johnson
Why the hubbub over a B-52 taking off from a B-52 base in Minot, North Dakota and subsequently landing at a B-52 base in Barksdale, Louisiana? That’s like getting excited if you see postal worker in uniform walking out of a post office. And how does someone watching a B-52 land identify the cruise missiles as nukes? It just does not make sense.
So I called a old friend and retired B-52 pilot and asked him. What he told me offers one compelling case of circumstantial evidence. My buddy, let’s call him Jack D. Ripper, reminded me that the only times you put weapons on a plane is when they are on alert or if you are tasked to move the weapons to a specific site.
Then he told me something I had not heard before.
Barksdale Air Force Base is being used as a jumping off point for Middle East operations. Gee, why would we want cruise missile nukes at Barksdale Air Force Base. Can’t imagine we would need to use them in Iraq. Why would we want to preposition nuclear weapons at a base conducting Middle East operations?
His final point was to observe that someone on the inside obviously leaked the info that the planes were carrying nukes. A B-52 landing at Barksdale is a non-event. A B-52 landing with nukes. That is something else.
Now maybe there is an innocent explanation for this? I can’t think of one. What is certain is that the pilots of this plane did not just make a last minute decision to strap on some nukes and take them for a joy ride. We need some tough questions and clear answers. What the hell is going on? Did someone at Barksdale try to indirectly warn the American people that the Bush Administration is staging nukes for Iran? I don’t know, but it is a question worth asking.
Copyright - Booman Tribune
2007-09-06 22:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Recently, President Bush learned that a Terrorists Cell was operating under the guise of a Cub Scout troop in Louisianna. In response to this new threat, President Bush decided to use a show of force by theatening to drop a nuclear bomb. At the last moment, however, Secretary Rice convince President Bush not to nuke Troop 103 and to let them off with a "time out" and no snack after supper. The nuclear weapon remains in Louisana."
2007-09-05 15:51:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
A tempest in a teapot. Many nukes are on planes, subs, ships at any given moment out on maneuvers all over the world. But only the President can issue the codes that would activate them.
2007-09-05 15:53:57 · answer #4 · answered by nileslad 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Let's see.
1. Bush is The Decider, the self-proclaimed "war president."
2. A B-52 is a military aircraft. Military aircraft are obviously under the jurisdiction and control of the military
3. Therefore, any f-ups having to do with what the military is in charge of are the military's responsibility, and since Bush is the Emperor-in-Chief of the military - ultimate blame rests at his feet.
QED
How about that?
In reality, this incident just shows how grossly incompetent our military and government has become in general.
2007-09-05 15:47:28 · answer #5 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Bush wants to run the country as a CEO runs a company. As such anything that happens in his company the head of the company must be accoutable for. He may not be responsible for the foul up but he is accountable since he is in charge of the America Corporation sometimes called Bushco.
2007-09-05 15:58:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It was not really going to Louisiana, It was headed for the clinton porn house (Library) for use by clinton and another intern as a cigar with a bang.
2007-09-05 17:09:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you look closer, the distance between those 2 state is smilar from saudi arabia to iran,
2007-09-05 18:26:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
As Michael Dukakis once said, "when a fish rots, it starts at the head." In an administration marked by fμck-ups, this isn`t all that surprising.
2007-09-05 15:48:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Obviously a plot to finish what Katrina started when Bush attacked Louisiana last time.
Beat me to it booman..great minds...
2007-09-05 15:47:07 · answer #10 · answered by makrothumeo2 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋