limbaugh has been a big fat drug using divisive, racist, hatemonger for years he has helped divide this country with his liberals are the enemy nonsense. oreilly bloviates everynight about left wing loonies while backing the dumbest president in history .both push a dangerous right wing agenda that hates blacks, immigrants legal or illegal, women ,and anything that errodes power from arrogant conservative white men. i guess i blame rush more because his talk contributed to the huge division thats threatens us all.
2007-09-05 08:12:35 · 17 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It's a tough call. Rush is a very biased conservative and O'reilly is a biased liberal.....
2007-09-05 08:19:05 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
complicated call. ann pronounced she would be able to no longer vote for McCain, so she does have a cluster of suggestions cells. rush is the rodeo clown for the Elephant's rodeo.... hmmm, i pick to assert oreilly. invoice O'Reilly does not understand a thank you to apply a dildo while he's on the telephone and attempting to make an impression with a co-worker.
2016-10-18 01:17:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's like asking if you'd rather be stabbed to death or shot to death.
BOTH of these loudmouth cretins are nothing more than rude, biased, bigoted, hate-filled propagandists.
But I believe Limbaugh is the WORST. It's only a matter of time before Limbaugh convinces his 'ditto heads' that it's 'acceptable' to injure - and maybe even KILL - liberals, or anyone else who doesn't agree with his conservative agendas. Hitler persuaded otherwise-intelligent Germans to believe it was 'acceptable' to gas six million Jews, thanks in large part to the massive propaganda machine he had in place. Limbaugh is no different; he is nothing more than a contemporary version of Hitler's henchmen. Limbaugh is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party, and a drug-abusing scar on America's heritage of equality and fairness. -RKO- 09/05/07
2007-09-05 08:28:09 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I see the biggest evil in those lazy, spineless hate-spewing people who find it easier to "copy & paste" the same tired lies from the liberal talking points machine into their thinking than to actually open their minds, listen to all of the information and then THINK for themselves.
Anybody can memorize the crap that comes from Bill Mahr and Rosie O'Donnell and then spit it out with authority like it's their own.
I expect over the next 20 or 30 years all you kids will experience a little of life and realize that you can't know it all by watching MSNBC and ranting against whomever you're told to.
2007-09-05 13:00:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are an ignorant person. Plain and simple. Your little diatribe exposes the fact that you have never listened to either of these men speak about the topics you would have us believe you care about. Stop pretending to be a man and try to actually be one. Listen to Rush for a week and open your freekin' mind. Then join the human race.
2007-09-05 18:32:09 · answer #5 · answered by Salsa Shark 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think Rush as well only because I see him as more serius than O'Reilly who's show at times takes on a Jerry Springer type look
2007-09-05 08:47:23 · answer #6 · answered by snoopy22564 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Keith Olbermann
2007-09-05 08:17:02 · answer #7 · answered by SEXIEST AVATAR™ is HERE. 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Neither.
Air America, Bill Maher, Keith Olbermann, etc.
2007-09-05 08:17:15 · answer #8 · answered by Supercell 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
... I can't make a decision.
I guess Rush because he's been around longer. O'Reilly is.... well, equally bad. But his voice is 0.0001% more pleasing to listen to.
2007-09-05 08:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You make a pretty good argument for both. They're both evil.
2007-09-05 08:16:59 · answer #10 · answered by CALAVA 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋