Please could you read this, i have dyslexia (i love spell check) about womens suffrage. i read this over again

Question

but my grammar and ordering of paragraphs is appauling, please could you help? xxx Throughout most of the 19th and 18th Century, women were classified as inferior to men, and therefore the right to the franchise for women was considered as unacceptable due to the cultural restraints. The Times Newspaper dubbed the two main groups of the era the suffragettes and suffragists, but they were known more officially as the as the NUWSS and the WSPU. In 1889, Millicent Fawcett, a middle class and well-educated woman, becoming the first female doctor in Britain, formed the NUWSS, the party that used more diplomatic methods in comparison to the later WSPU in order to attain the vote. The tactics of the group included petitions, leaflets and posters, peaceful protests and organised meetings, which all provoked a temporary interest from the media. The suffragists clearly stated that they would take no violent action in order to attain the vote, with the statement from Fawcett:

“to show the world how to gain reforms without killing people and blowing up buildings and doing other silly things that men have done when they wanted the laws altered”. Their motto, “the aim is everything,” perhaps best summarised their less obtrusive methods. The members were usually more working class and were more interested in improving the lot of women as a whole, as well as men, rather than just securing the vote for women. They set up women's hospitals and improved maternity care in their hometowns, and their non-violent methods increased the number of members.

However, the progress of the NUWSS was slow, and a new branch for the campaign for franchise was formed as the more radical WSPU, led by Emmeline Pankhurst of Manchester. They chained themselves to railings famous example, set fire to mail boxes, smashed windows, and set off crude home made bombs, HECKLed, DISRUTING MEETINGS famous ex, and STONE THROWING. One suffragette member, Emily Davison, died due to throwing herself under the Kings horse at the 1913 Epsom Derby. Though these methods were opposed by the NUWSS and the believed that they were jeopardising their progress by giving them media attention for illegal behaviour, altogether proving that women should not be allowed the vote due to reckless behaviour. On the other hand, the suffragettes did get media attention and public awareness, as they showed how far they would go for women’s rights and the problems it caused. Many women were imprisoned, and force-fed when they went on hunger strikes.

During World War 1 women willingly took on what were considered jobs for men only, and doing so proved what they were capable of doing in a crisis and in 1918 they finally got the right to vote in a General Election-if they were aged 30, married, householders, occupiers of property with an annual rent five pounds and graduates of universities. Their motto, “deeds not words” also shows their more violent methods.

Answer 1

I tend to agree this was copied. Are you British or American? Because if you are American, this piece has REALLY given away that it's plagiarized.

Answer 2

Well, based on the way you asked for your help and then reading the article, I believe you have just copied word for word this article and it isn't your own thoughts or written by your ideas. If that is so, unless you state that in your work, it can be considered a copyright crime which is when someone takes someone else's work or words and uses them without permission without giving them the credit for the work. Also, your teacher will automatically know that is what you have done since she knows your usual work. I suggest you read this article and then write it in your own words or have someone read it to you, maybe paragraph by paragraph and then write each paragraph in your own words so that it then becomes your work and not someone elses, if that is the case with this article.

Answer 3

I agree with the lady above me. The best way to do this is to site the work that you have copied. But, here is another way. Double space and enlarge the print of the document, print the document, then go through what you have written adding little comments in the spaces (or your opinions), then re-write the paper. It sounds really good but it does sound copied. Good luck.