You can poke fun at the GOP but Bush will not be on the Ballot so can the liberals ever get over Bush hatred and show the country they can lead and keep their donors from fleeing to China?
2007-09-05 07:32:45 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Shhhh, they will call you names and say that Bush will declare Martial Law and be president forever.
2007-09-05 07:36:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is Not the GOP that WE ARE AGAIN'ST! It is people like you! You ask leading questions, but give no substance, accept a possible Threat from China! Tje GOP would not be in trouble now, except they gave Carte Blanche to a President who took it and RAN and didn't give TWO CENTS about how the American Public, both Democrat and Republican felt about it! A President who didn't care what the United States Senate or House of Representatives had to say about anything is Not A Good Govenor! How about a President who has labeled himself THE DECIDER"! Well, you know Hitler was a Decider, along with every other DICTATOR known on this Planet! Even Republican's I know are against Everything He Is! If Republican's don't change, they will be tossed out! It's a Guarantee!
2007-09-05 10:02:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Bush is currently the commander in chief. He is the face of the republican party. We know Cheny isn't going to run, so until a Republican frontrunner emerges, it is easier to attack Bush, especially with his approval rating falling everytime they do a poll. I am not certain what to suggest about your 'donors fleeing to China' quote. You are correct when you say that it should be the Democrat against the GOP and it will be, once the respective representatives are determined. I am glad someone is taking notice and interest in this matter.
2007-09-05 07:40:50 · answer #3 · answered by Patrick 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Want to know why, and I mean really know? Because all the major front runners in the Republican Party, at one time or another, have supported him, many of them recently. This shows that they're for the policies he's been expousing, and that therefore they're willing to enact them again. Attacking Bush is a way of showing just how wrong that idea is. As for this idea that "liberals don't want to show their own policies," take a look at any candidate's website. Each says something bad about Bush (yes, even the Republicans), and gives a listing of the ideas they have for their own presidencies. Next time, make a question that's harder to answer, there's plenty of basis for this one.
2007-09-05 08:05:19 · answer #4 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because if they quit bashing Bush, they'll have to run on their own issues and display the emptiness of their own agenda! Liberals hide their own ineptness behind Bush-phobia in the hopes that the rest of the country won't notice their hypocrisy. And with the ignorance of most Americans and their forgetfulness of past political performance by the Dimmocraps and the Left, it'll probably work again!
They have nothing new to offer the country ... just the same old stuff over and over and over again with the same old failures, over and over and over again! All they know is raise taxes, spend money, raise taxes even more, spend even more money. But then, Repooplicruds seem to be stuck on the spend money part just as much as the Dimmocraps.
2007-09-05 08:00:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because hatred of President Bush is all there is to the Democratic party platform.
2007-09-05 09:22:05 · answer #6 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way that Democrats can face Bush again on a ballot is if John Ellis "Jeb" Bush decides to run in 2008. If Jeb Bush runs, not only will I vote for him, but I will do everything I can to get him elected.
2007-09-05 08:18:36 · answer #7 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
as a results of fact Bush has perpetually replaced the politcal panorama and as a siting President he's honest sport. we are no longer purely "poking relaxing" on the guy, he's perverting our shape and he must be HELD in charge for his movements. he's lied to us repeatedly back, so in spite of the fact that that is not any longer decrease than oath, that is nonetheless delivered approximately many extra deaths than Clinton's lies ever had. Why are you nonetheless harping on Clinton and his blowjobs? And by using how, he wasn't impeached, study something.
2016-10-18 01:14:08 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey... let 'em keep punching themselves out on a lame duck all they want. The '08 voters will be saying "OK... but what are you for?? Bush is gone in few months." They always want to fight the last war and end up blowing the big elections.
2007-09-05 07:41:22 · answer #9 · answered by nileslad 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
you've got allot of nerve calling Bush GOP
The people at the controls right now are ideologues, and if they have their way we will end up with some kind of unholy alliance of big business and Christian conservatism. Military-industrial theocracy isn't something I would like to live under. And when I bring up Bush that is what I'm speaking out against.
2007-09-05 07:35:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋