www.disclosureproject.org
Please actually watch the testimonies before you make your reply, and keep in mind that a Congressional Hearing has been denied them and swept under the rug, many times.
2007-09-05 07:08:59 · 9 answers · asked by The King in Yellow 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Alternative ➔ Paranormal Phenomena
http://www.disclosureproject.org
2007-09-05 07:46:47 · update #1
Well, since Stephen Greer is running this project practically out of his own pocket, he probably requires some kind of monetary support, albeit not much, to keep his movement moving. But you can see most of the testimonies for free on Youtube or Google Video. You say "why not put the truth out there?" well, why doesn't the government deny these claims? The most they ever say is "That's Confidential". The truth is so evident now, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that I believe any skeptic is a person who refuses to do his research, to find that millions of people worldwide, thousands of them in reputable government positions, can vouch that they have had experiences with UFOs. There is numberless video and picture (Most of which are probably fake, but theres no way to prove any picture of ANYTHING is real) There are documents the government has written on protocol for pilots when they encounter UFOs. You people don't want to believe, just as much as us believers DO want to believe.
2007-09-05 08:57:48 · update #2
Skeptics have derided or ignored many pioneers of science and technology at the time of their greatest discoveries. It is only later that they have become elevated to the status of heroes.Alexander Graham Bell ?A completely idiotic idea,;
Wilbur and Orville Wright ( Wright brothers' ),"Experts "were so convinced, on purely scientific grounds, that heavier than air flight was impossible that they rejected the Wright brothers' claims without troubling to examine the evidence.
You might imagine that such intolerance was historical only and that in today's enlightened, educated world no scientist would behave in such an intolerant way. Some areas of scientific research are so sensitive and so jealously guarded by conventional science that anyone who dares to dabble in them -- or even to debate them in public -- is likely to bring down condemnation from the scientific establishment on their head, and risk being derided, ridiculed or even called insane
.Cold Fusion ?,Psychokinesis -- Mind over Matter?,Bio energy?Darwinism?Maurice Ward,and the discovery of a thin plastic coating able to withstand temperatures of 2,700 degrees Centigrade?Remote viewing -- The experiment that was too successful ?
Ether - a null result, or an anulled result? so basically they Will
tell you the same,heresy! impossible! lunatic garbage !
Normal science texts are dishonest to the extent that they hide the huge mistakes made by the scientific community, and the acts of intellectual suppression directed at the researchers by colleagues.
"Concepts which have proved useful for ordering things easily assume so great an authority over us, that we forget their terrestrial origin and accept them as unalterable facts. They then become labeled as 'conceptual necessities,' etc. The road of scientific progress is frequently blocked for long periods by such errors." - Einstein
2007-09-05 13:15:12 · answer #1 · answered by kokopelli 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
As is typical of skeptics (let's call them what they are debunkers) I noticed that the previous posters couldn't be bothered to look at any evidence that might contradict their beliefs. Scientist are skeptical of all evidence while debunkers refuse to look at evidence.
As for wasting the time of congress. Health care is still a huge concern, social security needs some work, the budget could use some work and what I see is endless debate on gay marriage. I think the congress does a great job wasting time on it's own and if the public wants the congress to look into UFO's (or anything else) it's the US citizens (the voters) time to waste not the congress's.
I think the ideas of disclosure are well intentioned enough but even if one area of government decided to be open about any subject another area of government would keep that information from the public. This has long been the case with NASA a supposedly civilian organization that is under constant military observation.
Michal John Weaver, M.S.
2007-09-05 09:14:57 · answer #2 · answered by psiexploration 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well, I'm sure that the skeptics would say that these testimonies aren't proof either. Unless these UFOs are directly interfering with your present life, you really needn't concern yourself with the disclosure. Just accept that they may exist and go on with your life. To me this is just as pointless as the conspiracy arguments or Gods existence. I watched this video about a year ago and wasn't really impressed with it then either. I think I've heard enough about it most of my life now so that it really doesn't interest me so much anymore. If it is true than we'll get our disclosure eventually anyway. Right now the real enemy is the corporate oil companies and their bed fellows.
2007-09-05 11:48:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I didn't see any testimonies, but I would like to point out that testimonial evidence is in no way scientific proof.
Honestly, I dont see anything here that is skeptical or believers. Its just a bunch of people who want to sell books and stuff by making themselves appear important, and as if they are dealing with goverment officials on this stuff.
I highly doubt that the people who are running this project even believe in UFOs and aliens and such.
2007-09-05 08:44:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Government conspiracy theorists love UFOs. Of course they're not going to get a congressional hearing. Think if every wacky organization was entitled to waste the congress' time. That's all I really have to say about that.
2007-09-05 08:04:04 · answer #5 · answered by John 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have seen it. I am not impressed with anecdotal evidence because I don't know the people giving the testimony. I have met many seemingly-normal people who have some real crackpot ideas. These people could be among them.
Comparing the world of the paranormal (with it's total lack of evidence) with the development of mechanical devices (i.e. airplanes, telephones) is intellectually dishonest. One group followed evidence with experiments and development while the other group begins with the conclusion and seeks evidence to support it.
2007-09-05 13:50:11 · answer #6 · answered by Peter D 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
our goverment corrupt. noooooooo. say it ain't so. of course they know about ufo's. and yes they are working with them. but hysteria and the goverments need for total control is what keeps the truth hidden.
2007-09-05 22:46:00 · answer #7 · answered by Yvonne B 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Believe whatever you want...it's not my job to teach pigs to fly.
The UFO Curse: No matter how long you live you will never know any more about UFOs than you know today. You will never know any more about what UFOs really are, or where they come from. You will never know any more about what the U.S. Government really knows about UFOs than you know today. As you lie on your own death-bed, you will be as mystified about UFOs as you are today. And you will remember this curse.
2007-09-05 08:43:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I don't want to download from that site.Way to much selling going on.I'm always suspicious of that.If they have the truth.Why not put it out there?
2007-09-05 07:53:54 · answer #9 · answered by Dr. NG 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋