or one who fights her own countrymen?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295177,00.html
"Everything, even the threat of losing innocent American lives, is secondary to her obsession with crushing the right wing and Republicans."
2007-09-05 06:49:00 · 14 answers · asked by jrldsmith 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Excellent article that link. It's just as described for her and for many democrats they "understand" why the world hates us, they understand "Al Qaeda" they say we need to get along with our enemies. However they save all the hatred and vitriol to their fellow country men who happen to be labelled 'right wing' or below human.
2007-09-05 07:02:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer a leader who would negotiate with our enemies and be willing to work out differences first. The pre-emptive attack on Iraq, a country that never "attacked" us was WRONG and has turned out to be the worst blunder of all time. There are other more effective ways such as diplomacy, politics and rigid undercover work than a costly, ineffective militaristic approach.
2007-09-05 06:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by Raven 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be good to have a president who fights America’s enemies rather than making up enemies to fight, like the current president, or aiding terrorist recruitment, like the current president.
Hillary would be a good president because she’s sensible and she’s tough. You may not like to hear about the right-wing conspiracy but it does exist. It would be dishonest to deny it or ignore it.
2007-09-05 06:57:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The same could be asked about "The Shrub," as Dubya has been waging a war against American values and liberties to give himself and his handler, Cheney, dictatorial powers.
I'm sorry, but out here in the "reality-based community," as Bushies call the real world, we don't get our facts from FOX.
2007-09-05 06:56:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
We need a leader who will fight our enemies on all fronts. Iraq, Iran, Afganistan, and right here in the U.S. I have yet to see a politician who will stand up and seriously secure this nations borders, deport those who are here illegally, and go after those who hire illegal immigrants.
2007-09-05 07:00:13 · answer #5 · answered by Critical Thinker No 1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whoever the super employer assist you to be attentive to to combat, and that they do it contained in direction of the speaking heads in Washington. With bases everywhere, and under a hundred "terrorists" in Afghanistan, the troops must be shuffled over to someplace else, for the subsequent conflict. Joe is conscious something.
2016-10-10 00:24:38 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A leader who fights your nation's (true) enemies (such as Al-Qaida). In other words, a leader who uses deodorant.
2007-09-05 06:58:06 · answer #7 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would honor a leader that stops making enemies for us to fight.
2007-09-05 07:04:23 · answer #8 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this isn't news ... its opinion
there is some scary stuff about Hillary, no question
but she is still a viable option to get us back on track, we may need a ***** in the white house to undo much of the damage Bush has done
2007-09-05 06:57:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don't believe everything you read...
I want someone who is interested in the poverty that is going on in our country, yet enables us to help ourselves, not to depend on welfare, one that promotes education within our own countries and budgets to help us. It sounds selfish, but how can you help to fix other countries when there are still flaws in this country?
2007-09-05 06:57:07 · answer #10 · answered by bonstermonster20 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋