English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

I think he should, and this new information proves what I and many others have been saying all along. It's strange how, now that a reason has been revealed, there are a lot more people who are sorry he's dead. However, those who called him a monster are still acting horribly, while in my view they should feel remorse for their words. He was BRAIN DAMAGED, and in essence had no control over his behaviour at times. After his death, even when it came out that he had killed his family, people still talked about how wonderful he was. This tells me that when he was in control, he was the nicest guy in the world; and when he wasn't, that was when this horrible tragedy occurred.

I've proudly said it before, and I'll proudly say it again:

RIP Nancy and Daniel, you're sadly missed by people.

RIP Chris, you're JUST as missed by people.

2007-09-05 06:48:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes- you have the separate the man from the performer.

Let be realistic in what the WWE Hall of Fame is- a money making scam...

It like having a hall of fame for soap opera stars. There is no such thing.

I do not even think there is some physical place (such as MLB and NFL) to visit the wrestling greats from the past.

Anyway, he should be inducted with the stipulation mentioning that he committed the murders on his plaque (if there is one).

That is what they should have done with O.J.

2007-09-05 13:20:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes. As it turns out, his brain was damaged. Here is who should be inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2008:

Stone Cold
Owen Hart
The Rock
Vince McMahon
Randy Savage
Bruno Sammartino
Chris Benoit
Bam Bam Bigelow
Bossman
Big Show

2007-09-05 13:47:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I say wait a few years down the road for the sour taste to leave everyones mouth. Maybe around 5 years from now. There always is time for that.
Chris had problems, mental problems. It didnt come from steroids or anything like that. Still this does not excuse what he did, what he did was wrong.
Yet one day down the road i hope everyone can come to terms with that, understand he was out of his mind and maybe induct him into the Hall of Fame.

2007-09-05 13:27:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

2009 "Hall Of Fame" Please!
{Chris Benoit “Obsessed with Wrestling” over-bounded 300 day Working Year claims.
Toxicity is Mute! Rage-Roid is Mute! Steroid Mismanagement induced Medicinal Insanity Evidenced.
Chris Restocked and Displayed his On-line Steroids when he had the Time to Flush.
Family Bible Display intending to Silence, past Story-line believers.
Nancy Benoit’s recent Neck reconstruction Surgery’s was healing, was Accused!
Daniel “may” have been in Steroid development?
Disablement Diagnosis “or” Indictment was to limit Wrestling Stature.}
Withdrawal from Extreme Steroid Use weakens, is Brutal, and Irreversible, so Addictions Despised.

2007-09-05 13:13:40 · answer #5 · answered by moonscope 5 · 0 3

Yep...aren't them inducted to the WWE Hall of Fame for their brilliant past in the wrestling industry...so why should he not be in the WWE Hall of Fame

2007-09-05 13:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by manish_wolfyfox 5 · 2 1

benoit should have never been denied a spot in the wwe hall of fame in the first place. so totally, he deserves to be inducted, maybe not now, but soon.

2007-09-05 13:20:17 · answer #7 · answered by nextgreatsuperhero 4 · 3 1

He never will. WWE wants nothing to do with him ever again. He is a loser that was on steroids (proven) and planned the murder of his wife and defenseless child. He may have had concussions, but that is no excuse for murder. Troy Aikman had tons of concussions, and he is sane. I'm sure the people here saying yes are children that don't have a grasp on reality yet.

2007-09-05 14:28:44 · answer #8 · answered by Frank P 3 · 0 2

See this is tough... I think he should because as a wrestler he was amazing, you know? what he did in his personal life shouldn't effect that but I'm sure they won't put him in because then they'll do a tribute to him and how can they end that softly? I really feel though as a wrestling fan that he should be indited into the hall... like I said in his time as wrestler he put on one hell of a show

2007-09-05 13:17:26 · answer #9 · answered by candice 2 · 3 1

No..........!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't care what the reason behind the murders was, he still committed murder. He should never be mentioned again during WWE broadcasts or on WWE 24/7. It was horrific what he did and just because he had the brain of an 85 year old, doesn't give him an excuse to kill people.

Had he just killed himself, I would say definitely so, but not when 2 other lives were involved.


To those saying he should be in based on his wrestling...Pete Rose is not in the Baseball Hall of Fame and what he did was not done during his playing years, it should be based on what he did on the field, but he isn't in, is he? And he sure as hell didn't kill anyone. All he did was gamble....

2007-09-05 13:13:49 · answer #10 · answered by d7602002 4 · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers