2007-09-05
05:03:25
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Martin L
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Regerugged, it sure seems that way sometimes, and it seems prevalent on both sides of the political fence.
2007-09-05
06:14:03 ·
update #1
Patriotwww, I agree. But it could be argued that the founding principles had little to do with the unfetterred will of the people either. The founders demanded representation, but warned against the “tyranny of the majority” with equal fervor.
2007-09-05
06:17:31 ·
update #2
Everythingyoumissed, nice response, if a bit one-sided. But I must disagree on one point: It has always been a federal crime to threaten to kill the President, and the Secret Service has done the same under Carter, Clinton, or any other Democrat. They take every threat to the President seriously, and they don’t ignore any perceived threat, no matter how minor. In this case, the girl (14 years old, not 12) posted a picture of the president, scrawled "Kill Bush" across the top and drew a dagger stabbing his outstretched hand. The Secret Service pulled her out of class (9th Grade Biology) and questioned her for two hours. Every once in a while someone slips up and demonstrates a desire to kill the president (either real or in jest), and these demonstrations have always been met with a relatively harsh response. I say relatively, because in a majority of countries in the world, the person making such a statement would simply disappear without trial.
2007-09-05
07:06:04 ·
update #3