English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know carbocation stability proceeds tert>sec>prim, but does that mean carbanions are opposite?

one more detail. My problem is showing a butane with a lone pair on the second carbon. I have to compare relative stabilities with a CH2 substituent on a cyclohexane. I need to know WHY one or the other is less stable.

2007-09-05 03:36:40 · 3 answers · asked by The GMC 6 in Science & Mathematics Chemistry

Thanks first guy, that is what I put, I just wanted to be sure.

2007-09-05 04:18:29 · update #1

3 answers

Yes, carbanions have a -ve charge unlike the +ve charge in carcocations.

The cyclohexane one (radical) is more stable since more resonance structures are possible.

2007-09-05 03:45:47 · answer #1 · answered by ag_iitkgp 7 · 4 0

Figure that the stability of a carbanion is determined by
1) inductive effect. Electronegative atoms adjacent to the charge will stabilise the charge.
2) hybridisation of the charge-bearing atom. The greater the s-character of the charge -bearing atom, the more stable is the anion
3) The extent of conjugation of the anion. Resonance effect can stabilise the anion

2007-09-05 04:04:22 · answer #2 · answered by Dr.A 7 · 0 2

carbanion is an intermediate formed in Grignard rxn or organometalllic rxn...they work by SN2 mechanism which prefers as you know primary alkyl halide groups and they do not like tertiary or bulkyl groups at all because of steric hindrances. Tertiary prevents the nucleohphile from attacking the right carbon.

2016-05-17 08:22:46 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers