English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've seen several "questions" on here lately about President Clinton being "accused" of rape, and I'm one for fair play. So, how many out there have heard/read about this poor black woman?

I guess this shoots the "liberal media" theory all to hell, huh?

http://www.thoughtcrimenews.com/bushrape.htm

2007-09-05 02:05:46 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

To "bleh" - You missed the entire point of the question. FAIR PLAY in relation to the accusations against President Clinton. Please show me the "logic, facts, truth" to ANY of those trumped-up charges.

And I read about this a couple of years ago, I believe EVERY word of it. We're talking about BUSH here, man. Somebody who blew up frogs with firecrackers when he was a kid, somebody who giggled and mocked a woman who was on death row in Texas, a man who actually says he has the right to torture.

He's a psycho. Plain and simple.

2007-09-05 06:26:16 · update #1

8 answers

I have not read this before. I do remember reading about GWB blowing up frogs with firecrackers as a child, which would be an indicator of a sociopathic personality. But sociopaths are usually very intelligent though--unless he's pulling off one very convincing charade. The irony is he's now raping, plundering and blowing up a real country.

2007-09-05 03:23:29 · answer #1 · answered by Pete Schwetty 5 · 6 0

No. I hadn't heard about it. Even when the "Liberal Media" report on Republican scandals, they rarely follow up. You'd think that an accusation of rape against a sitting President would have gotten some coverage, if only to expose it as a hoax.

As for the accusations of rape against Bill Clinton, I've never seen a source cited or a name named. What he does have is one suit for sexual harassment which was dismissed by a Republican woman judge because it didn't meet the legal definition. But then, since when have Busheviks ever cared about facts, except to rant about the "Liberal Media" whenever the facts are thrown up to them?

2007-09-05 09:56:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Blue,

You might want to take care. I am working today but I haven’t left yet so I stopped in to Ans. If the story has validity, it is already withdrawn and difficult or impossible to find. Now you need to think about who or what hid it or if it really happened. I know you are passionate and are paying attention and this is one of the things I admire about your writing but if Baby did anything else to add to his litany of failures and that thing is scrubbed…take care. We need not be afraid but we need to use caution. Remember, in a dictatorship, we mustseek shadow and the company of freedon loving patriots, not the fake kind favored by the neo-cons but the actual, denotation of patriot.

I appreciate you taking me off the constant list; I barely have time to attempt to answer a few Q’s.

But I admit; I am addicted, as are you. lol

Jim D

2007-09-05 10:02:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

First I've heard about it - ironic. Bill’s White Water that never materialized is still used as a weapon by the “Right”, but Murder by Bush is overlooked. Hmmmm…

2007-09-05 09:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Facts, truth, logic, proof, law, and a lot more are lacking from this "fair play" rant. Just another AAABQ.

2007-09-05 12:19:58 · answer #5 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 1 1

If there was anything to this story the mainstream liberal press would have taken it and ran with it. From the pictures at the bottom of the page of your link, it looked like the publication was nothing more than some "rag" like the National Enquirer.

2007-09-05 09:45:00 · answer #6 · answered by mountaindew25 3 · 0 4

This is simple tabloid fodder.

If this were true, the press would have been all over it.

2007-09-05 10:54:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

no

2007-09-05 09:21:12 · answer #8 · answered by Rana 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers