I read somewhere that terrorists launched the attack on that day... 9-11... as a way to mock the Americans' way of contacting 911 in case of emergencies. As we all know, those attacks were not merely terrorist attacks, they were more of a psychological attack... a way to disrupt the American way of life. 911 was chosen because every American knows it. The terrorists made sure that their deed would forever be ingrained in the hearts and minds of every American.
2007-09-05 09:43:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by 123mantobeat456 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no truth. At first, you'll be stunned at how it happened. Its just that someone collected all details that can be attributted to the number 11 and relate it to a bad luck or some sheme.
It is but human nature to search for patterns even where none
exist. We attempt to impose a gestalt on randomness because chaos is
difficult to comprehend, hence our fascination with recurrent themes. We
feel something of great import is going on if a particular number comes up
time and again, and we are unsettled by
it.
And yet, it's all randomness. That is not to say that at times any number
plucked from the air will not appear more often than is the norm because
such clumpings are only an expected part of the process of random
distribution. Even though a flipped coin comes up heads five hundred times
out of a thousand, it does not follow that each 'head' occurrence is
immediately followed by a 'tails' — inevitably during a run of a thousand
trials, there will be moments wherein the 'tails' tally varies
significantly from the 'heads' count. Clumping can and does occur, and
random numbers seemingly appear more often at various moments in time.
Over the long run, of course, everything evens out. But at the moment when
13 comes up four times in a row on a roulette wheel, or 11 seems to jump
off the page at one, it all seems so very eerie.
And in the example cited at the head of this page, the repeated occurrence
of 11 isn't even really an amazing string of multiple random occurrences
but rather a contrived and manufactured method of producing a desired
result. One simply chooses only the elements that fit the intended pattern
and ignores the rest (e.g., many of the other significant phrases
associated with the 9/11 attacks on America, such as "World Trade Center,"
"American Airlines," "United Airlines," or "Washington, D.C." aren't
spelled using eleven letters, so they aren't included), manipulates the
elements however necessary (e.g., the digits in "9/11" are added to
produce a result of eleven, but the digits in "111" are left alone because
the result of a similar addition would be three, not eleven), and glosses
over inconvenient details (e.g., neither Iraq nor Iran has 119 as its
telephone country code; American Airlines Flight 77 carried 64 people, not
65).
2007-09-05 00:46:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by jl_manzano04 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Anybody who doesn't know those buildings were brought down demolition style have to be brain dead. It took NIST 7 years to admit Building 7 fell at free fall speed but nobody else needs to take that long, just look at scientific laws. The Law of Conservation of Momentum which predicts that if the towers had collapsed due to fires or jetliner damage, then that fall would have taken approximately 45 seconds due to the measurable scientific fact that the falls would have encountered natural resistance as each floor collapsed atop the next. A 10-second collapse is in full accord with Galileo‘s Law of Falling Bodies determining the rate of collapse of an object for which resistance has been removed. Analysis of the collapses by structural engineers, physics professors and other scientists conclusively proves that they were, by scientific necessity, the result of planned demolition.
2016-05-17 07:22:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the 11 thing is interesting, i think 911 was part of the u.s. government and the ceo of the tower's plan for urban renewal... the building were worth a tremendous amount of money after the attack compared to there operational status before 911. it is odd that the ceo acquired the property and such from the port authority in early spring then insured them specifically for a plane being flown into the structure. that's a little convenient since he managed to file a claim on both towers "2planes used" bunch of crap if you as me...check out the video yourself... ties it altogether!
2007-09-05 04:42:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by rice2715 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you're grasping at straws here.
2007-09-05 02:46:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
How many ID's do you have?
2007-09-05 00:31:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Criss_Mousse 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
weird
thanks for sharing
2007-09-05 00:45:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ye ... terrorist.... hmmm.... WAKE UP BUDDY.
2007-09-05 00:39:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
http://www.greatdreams.com/trade_numbers.htm
http://www.greaterthings.com/News/911/Prophecy/
2007-09-05 07:33:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋