English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...knowing full well that he was not going to stop the attack on the US by foreigners that were allowed into the country by Clinton, and were allowed by Clinton to train here for years to pull it off. Shouldn't we have know that Bush wasn't the right man to stop the carnage that was started by the Clinton Adminisration?

2007-09-04 17:49:08 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

9 answers

I love you all who try to blame 9/11 on Clinton. Have you heard of Wag The Dog. Yes, you impeachers where too busy screaming and whining about consensual sex. When Clinton mentioned Osama bin Laden you cried that he was only trying to take the heat off. Bush was fully briefed on activity and said "You have now saved you a**" and continued on with his merry vacation. Bush was the failure and continues to fail in providing safety for Americans, Mr. Terrorist Creator Himself.

2007-09-05 17:32:10 · answer #1 · answered by sanityinga 2 · 0 1

I suppose Al Gore would have been? Seriously there was no contest who was the better choice. and Thank God he was elected.

However, 2008 is a new day. And its time we leave the 2 families who have been ruling this nation for the past 20 years and get some fresh blood in the white house with real ideas to change this country for the better.

2007-09-05 06:17:05 · answer #2 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0 0

Bush wasn't really elected the first time, he was -selected- by the Supreme Court. And evidence is mounting to prove that he wasn't elected legitimately the second time either.

If Bush hadn't been elected, President Gore would now be in his second term. 9/11 would have been headed off, and we wouldn't be stuck in a quagmire war in Iraq.

Gore would also have balanced the budget and refunded the surplus back to wage-earners and working people, and put a program in place to deal with global warming, but that's just frosting on the cake.

2007-09-05 01:00:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I snagged this from another answer. You've probably seen it before but take a few minutes (it's lonnnngggg) and read it through.
We've been deceived by a messenger of Satan. The good people of America are not the guilty , just gullible.

http://www.bushisantichrist.com/

2007-09-05 01:06:02 · answer #4 · answered by King of Turdblossom 2 · 0 0

The Republican party which sponsored him should be given a fitting answer in the forthcoming Presidential poll!

2007-09-05 01:01:55 · answer #5 · answered by Sami V 7 · 0 0

I just got back from Iraq and all I can say is go over there for 6 months then see if you have the gall to ask this question again.

2007-09-05 00:58:36 · answer #6 · answered by charm_of_making 2 · 2 3

Who you voting for next buddy?
The threat is still there.

2007-09-05 01:01:47 · answer #7 · answered by Dave 3 · 1 0

No.. but you should be tried... sorry, tested for stupidity. Nah.. no need. It already shows.

2007-09-05 01:17:28 · answer #8 · answered by hwan_tu 4 · 1 0

No.

2007-09-05 01:01:54 · answer #9 · answered by bobanalyst 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers