It's just a myth. I've actually experienced sex both uncircumcised and circumcised. When I was uncircumcised the only thing that took away from my pleasure was the act of my sliding in and out of my forskin rather in and out of my partners vagina. Actually Harriett makes a valid point kind of, In some cases it may indeed just depend on the individual.
2007-09-04 19:24:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
Honestly, it depends on the guy. Some guys feel really desensitized after a while if they're circumcised, whereas other guys have problems with their foreskins that'll make things feel not so great either. But there have been studies that seem to say that the foreskin not only makes things more sensitive, it can actually make sex more satisfying and better for both the man and woman (see links).
But you know, there are more important factors to how good sex feels other than being circumcised or not. In general, what you do with your penis and how you use it during sex can make a greater difference in how good things feel than simply being circumcised or not. So, it's not an all-important thing, but it helps to be uncircumcised as long as the foreskin's working normally (in general, according to the studies).
2007-09-05 04:16:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by trebla_5 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's impossible to compare the enjoyment in sex that two different people have, because nobody can feel someone else's sensations.
That said, there is probably a little bit of truth in what your friends say. Circumcised men have lost a lot of sensitive skin and think about it, is it reasonable that you lose sensitive skin without losing feeling? No. I have heard many men say sex was worse after circumcision - then again, a few say it was better, usually those who had foreskin problems. As well, most people are circumcised at birth, so they have no idea what life would have been like with a foreskin and they can't compare.
but circumcised men should still get enjoyment out of sex. Although there is a lot of evidence saying that sex with a natural man is better for the woman.
2007-09-04 17:10:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
What are you talking about by enjoyment? Lasting longer or enjoying the feeling? In the case of time, an uncircumsized penis would most likely last longer since there is foreskin over the glans (head), which is where you get your sexual stimulation...much like the clitoris in women. On the other hand...a circumsized penis would probably enjoy the feeling a bit more.
2007-09-04 16:43:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
There is no proof of this. Orgasms are the same, regardless of circumsizing. An uncircumsized penis may be a little more sensitive, but not enough to make a difference.
2007-09-04 16:10:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by hanksimon 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
What you have heard is utter rubbish!. I was circumcised as an adult for no medical reason but in response to a request from my (then new) wife who much prefers a circumcised penis and I will tell you that without doubt the greatest benefit which comes with being circumcised is the hugely increased enjoyment of sex without a foreskin to get in the way. Uncircumcised men just slide inside their own foreskin instead of their partners vagina. The sexual sensation is in the penis head, not the blanket of useless foreskin. The only sensations which are reduced in time by circumcision are the non-sexual ones such as the initial discomfort when the naked glans of a newly circumcised man brushes against his clothing. Sexual sensation is enhanced and remains enhanced permanently. Sex with a circumcised man is far better for the woman too, as any experienced knowledgeable woman will tell you. Ignore the "bleeding heart" anti-circumcision types like many of those who give "answers" above - they are either uncut males or young inexperienced women and neither can have any idea of what sex is like for a circumcised man. Listen to those who know and only a man circumcised as an adult can have any idea of the improvement that circumcision makes!
2007-09-04 20:03:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
they will not be able to enjoy it the way that nature intended. We have more nerve endings in our penis, it feels better for the woman and being that over 3/4 of the worlds men are uncircumcised it must be better to be intact.
If a guy was cut at birth then I suppose he will know no better and has to live with the choice that his parrents made for him against his will. Some men get done as an adult and I think deep down regret it so make out the uncut guys are dirty.
2007-09-04 22:16:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by darth72au 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Totally BS! I was circumcised at 18 and sex is 100% better when you are circumcised! When you are uncut you are basically masturbating inside your partner, when you are cut you actually feel the inside of your partner! Both you and she will have better orgasms as a result! It is also healthier and cleaner! You won't find to many women willing to blow an uncut guy! If you are circumcised you should be stoked you parents cared enough to have it done! When my two boys (1&3) were born they both were circumcised without any doubt on my behalf!
2007-09-05 00:02:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Your friends are correct. There is much evidence, scientific as well as anecdotal, that removing the nerve-rich foreskin and exposing the glans (head) to constant friction from clothing greatly reduces sexual sensation.
2007-09-04 16:19:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Maple 7
·
3⤊
4⤋
Dont listen to your friends. Im circumcised and i've had the best sex with girls before. I enjoy it every single time. I've been with heaps of girls and alot of girls have commented that they like my penis beacause its circumcised. Most girls prefer circumcised penises because its cleaner and they prefer the look as well. My girlfriend only had uncircumcised penises before me and she said that she definitely prefers circumcised now that shes experienced my circumcised penis.
2007-09-04 16:51:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by azza 1
·
3⤊
5⤋