I have TO and someone offered me Torry Holt. I think Holt is more consistant but TO has the potential for a huge year. Who should I take?
2007-09-04 13:27:37 · 7 answers · asked by Mark M 2 in Sports ➔ Fantasy Sports
The majority will say that Holt is the better option. However, Holt is currently having problems coming off of knee surgery. This said, Holt may be bothered by the knee and not be 100% at all this year. TO, on the otherhand, is always a red zone threat and should put up great fantasy numbers.
I have a feeling that Holt's owner is worried about his health, as he should be. You should be as well, so stick with TO.
2007-09-04 13:41:15 · answer #1 · answered by erdmanski1341 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TO is overrated? Wow...All I have to say is look at his numbers. It's not like dropped passes is a category in FF.
If it was up to me, I would take Owens over Holt strictly because of Holts recent injury and surgery. Anything with the knee is pretty serious, especially for a WR that needs to utilize speed and positioning.
However, if Holt was not injured/recovering, I would pick Holt.
2007-09-04 20:50:54 · answer #2 · answered by SpaDes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is a reason T.O. is rated higher than Holt in ALL the money leagues, in the red zone the rams go jackson, Dallas goes to Owens anywhere any time, Holt may get a few more yards than Owens like last year but Owens will more than make it up in TDs.
2007-09-04 21:36:39 · answer #3 · answered by shotgun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Holt. You dont need to worry about the "other stuff" as Holt is a pros pro and will give you basically the same elite numbers as Owens. Personally I would make the trade, they are both elites and both likely have monster years but if Holt doesnt get a ball early he wont pout and will just keep working like he is paid and do it quietly. Plus he has a better health history...something worth considering.
2007-09-04 20:42:11 · answer #4 · answered by viphockey4 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stick with T.O., the reason the other guy offered you Holt is because of the injuries, and the other guy knows this. If both are healthy, I would take Holt for sure, but if both were healthy, the other guy would never have offered this trade.
2007-09-04 21:03:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should take holt because TO is overrated
2007-09-04 20:32:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id take t.o. because st louis is gearing more to the run with steven jackson and holt is coming off a knee injury.
2007-09-04 20:58:49 · answer #7 · answered by #1 NFL FAN 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋