Did Richard Nixon kill JFK or did he arrange people to do it???

Question

i need some strong arguments and evidence to say that he did it

Answer 1

You'll get more replies (at least from libs) if you change "Richard Nixon" to "George Bush".

Answer 2

You'd have an easier time proving LBJ had a hand in the assassination. There were more Texans bent about civil rights than there were Californians. Killing Kennedy would not have done Nixon any good because LBJ would have walked away with the 1964 election, just from sympathy alone.

Answer 3

There's certainly no evidence. For arguments, you could try asserting that Nixon wanted revenge for the voter fraud that might have cost him the election (he declined to persue the allegations at the time, for the good of the country). Obviously, that argument would be strengthened if Gore at some point tried to have Bush assassinated...

Answer 4

No it was Johnson. So he could sign the US up for the Vietnam War.

Kidding.

No - I've never heard of a Nixon theory regarding the JFK murder.

Answer 5

the 1st time i'm listening to this. Ideologically (perspectives shared or no longer) there grew to become into no such extreme opposition between them calling for killing of an adversary. there is lot of distance between them for Nixon even to be triumphant in (or lay his arms on) JFK. In u . s . a . own animosities do no longer volume to lots. If there are or grounds exist, it is settled by using killing the different instantaneous, that doesn't contain a conspiracy of this way. while this sort of massive conspiracy got here to easy it only implies "pursuits" related to deeper issues on a great scale. for that reason the MIC (protection rigidity commercial complicated) could have felt threatened because of the fact the replace of coverage (JFK grew to become into suspected to have pondered it) could be a threat to jobs, contracts & one billion $ nicely worth of companies. In a concern the place the main effective guy (JFK) or female (Mm. Indira Gandhi) gets killed, it could only be an insider pastime. weapons at a distance from the place firing on a shifting objective & stuff is merely to divert public interest & to confuse them. i'm declaring Indira Gandhi's assassination by using her own physique-preserve, to declare (& to tutor) that no-one from outdoors the risk-free practices outer edge could have a 'attain' at that guy or woman. In her case it grew to become into sparkling as sunlight hours and no marks for a wager. in terms of JFK, a laboured attempt to divert the attention or obfuscate the opinion grew to become into there. besides the fact that it only strengthens the hypothesis as, else the place is the want for others to do all this mischief? On stability (because of the fact the controversy on JFK has unleashed the main factors) JFK made many enemies in the administration. It grew to become into so whilst the suspicion grew to become into pointed to Cuba or u.s.; that looks too obvious.No grounds exist, to have faith that the two of them have killed him as no particular reason grew to become into proffered. If one president grew to become into killed yet another will take his place with infrequently any replace in coverage. Even, there grew to become right into a communication that a rapprochement grew to become into on JFK's suggestions, that would flow damaging to a pair in the administration. this is only like the attempt on de Gaul by using an extreme suitable wing ex-soldier because of the fact de Gaul did no longer salary a conflict on Algeria. Many factors on which the administration is had to describe, however the needle of suspicion in no way pointed to Nixon.

Answer 6

Nixon actually bowled a 300 game and was an EXCELLENT poker player.

But a killer of his "competition" ????
No way.

Answer 7

You need to wake up and stop formulating goofy conspiracy theories.

Answer 8

He arranged for LBJ to do it.

Answer 9

No, he hired someone

proof

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare

Answer 10

I don't believe that at all.