george bush helpes stop the terrorists in iraq. unllike bill clinton did.
2007-09-04 10:07:51 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You will get many like the genius that answered second that will disagree because of their blind hatred for George Bush... they are lemmings that only hear their liberal leaders pander for power and throw this country under the bus like the traitors they are. I would point out to them that we have nuclear power and if he were the terrorist they duped into thinking he was Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan would be a glass parking lot by now. Asking them to think rationally is pointless.
2007-09-04 10:15:17 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. Perfect 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
George W. Bush is not a good president. He has created more terrorist. Don't think they're not already over here just waiting for the signal to do more damage than 9/11 did. It may be next week, next year, or in a couple of years, but they are here already.
2007-09-04 17:29:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pop D 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Everyone forgets Wag the Dog.
Clinton fired so many missiles into Iraq during the impeachment hearings that the military, air force and Navy, ran out of conventional war heads. They had to re-task the nukes to keep up.
What was he shooting at? He said he was enforcing the no fly zone. Saddam lost everything that would fly during the first Gulf war.
So here's the scene folks. The Iraqi kids are hiding under th bed during all this bombing and asking their parents: "Who is doing this mommy?". The parents answer, the Americans. Fast forward to today. Al Queda goes to these same kids who are now old enough to handle an AK47 and say: "Remember the Americans and all that bombing?" "How would you like to kill a few of them?"
We call them insurgents today. Thanks Bill.
2007-09-04 17:27:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
George Bush is the best president ever!!! I support him because he is a great patriot and a good leader.I really admire Bush,he is the best politician in the world.The troops will stay in Iraq until he say the opposite,he is the boss.GOD BLESS BUSH,GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!
I have a bush's picture in my computer as a background,He is my hero!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-09-04 17:22:13 · answer #4 · answered by The Apostle 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
George Bush is a good president. He has stopped the terrorizing of the people of Iraq by their old dictator Saddam. The free people of Iraq are now dealing with a different type of terrorism, but that is being fought right now and hopefully one day soon, they too will know peace and freedom.
2007-09-04 17:14:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
George Bush has herpes?
Ohhh.... "helps". Gotcha.
While it is true, there are terrorists in Iraq, and fighting them is a good thing, I would have preferred that the Iraqis themselves fight them. Less American lives lost, fewer civilian casualties.
We should have gotten a broad international coalition that forced Saddam to step down and be replaced with a leader that obeys international laws and doesn't kill civilians and put them in mass graves.
Instead, we destroyed the infrastructure and the existing government. Even in WW2 we were smart enough to leave many of the former Nazis in power so that they could maintain law and order under our supervision. Creating a whole new government creates chaos and makes enemies out of the moderates in the nation who might have supported us.
2007-09-04 17:13:06 · answer #6 · answered by askthepizzaguy 4 · 6⤊ 5⤋
im iranian and i know u all think we hate bush
its a good questio for me i want to say here that we love him and we respect him only our government hates him bcz our government is terrorist . thx for the question
2007-09-04 17:55:40 · answer #7 · answered by poujmak 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, he sure does helpes stop something. How has he stopped terrorism there? In fact, where was the terrorism there beforehand? Terrorism has become a fact of life there only since we decided to go in. The guerilla troops they have there are specifically dedicated to removing us from their country. Bill Clinton was what we'd call smarter. He decided that Iraq wasn't important to attack. Know who else was smarter? Bush's father, who decided not to stay on the basis that he didn't want to engage an insurgency. Guess what we have now? Oh wait, you probably don't know. Learn to spell insurgency, and learn to read the news before you post something like this.
2007-09-04 17:12:41 · answer #8 · answered by whiteflame55 6 · 5⤊ 6⤋
We didn't have terrorist in Iraq when Bill Clinton was president except Saddam himself. Saddam wouldn't let them in. Saddam was too jealous of his own power to let them in. And that's not what Bush was after when we went in either. He just turned it into that after we didn't find any 'W.M.D's'.
2007-09-04 17:21:31 · answer #9 · answered by Jackolantern 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have no idea what you are saying, are you asking did he stop terrorism in Iraq, answer no, read the news there are bombings, killings, and kidnapping on an almost daily basis.
2007-09-04 17:15:42 · answer #10 · answered by Jim C 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋