English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Obviously, I'm referring to the party frontrunners here. The personal lives of both will have very little influence over my vote between the two if they are nominated; But I'm curious as to the thoughts of those whose votes it will influence.

I suspect I'll get mostly conservative trolling in response; But I'm curious enough to ask anyway...

2007-09-04 09:50:48 · 6 answers · asked by ? 4 in Politics & Government Elections

Somebody want to look up a list of Reagan/Bush pardons so badkitty doesn't think the Clintons are the only ones who've pardoned people with bad things in their past? I'm too busy having a life to deal with the troll...

2007-09-04 10:03:52 · update #1

6 answers

How about a party front-runner who has neither had an affair nor been forced to forgive one?

Mitt Romney's been married to the same woman for well over thirty years now, still dotes on his wife in fact, and each of their five grown sons are now married.

Does that say enough about his family values, at least?

2007-09-04 21:38:59 · answer #1 · answered by Paper Mage 5 · 1 0

Actually, I don't care about instances of adultery in a candidate's past unless that candidate is preaching about maintaining "family values," at which point I care about the hypocrisy.

But given the choice, forgiving adultery is more noble than committing it.

2007-09-04 16:58:50 · answer #2 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 4 1

Family values. One person decided holding family together was more important than pride. The other person decided family wasn't important. Easy choice.

2007-09-04 17:07:08 · answer #3 · answered by Beth B 1 · 2 0

wow..are you also to busy to consider ALL the facts. if you think the "trolling" as you call it is about adultery against the liberal candidate, thats true, but definitely isnt ALL of it. without naming names, im unclear who your referring to but if your referring to rudy, i lived manhattan at 911 you probably read about it...i saw and interpreted the results as manhattan grew strong and prosperous....
this was the result i saw with clinton and the idea that somehow she" wasnt involved" or "didnt know" is pure horse caa caa.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

your question has no answer as character to you apparently does not matter. my contention is its a direct window into the soul and obviously from above my choice is clear.

2007-09-04 17:08:17 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 1

Well, they are people too just like us and as long as they do an awesome job who gives a damn who gets married or divorced and who cares how many times.

2007-09-04 16:58:54 · answer #5 · answered by me 4 · 3 2

Forgiving criminals is much worse. Especially when they are terrorists...

2007-09-04 17:01:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers