Isn't it pathetic the way Americans are blaming Bush for the Iraq debacle after voting for him twice?

Answer 1

Nope.............

Answer 2

What about those who did not vote for him twice? I voted for him the first time, but had a grip on the real Bush in 2004 and voted against him. Yes, I blame him for this debacle. When he told us all he was The Decider he made his choice to be the one responsible for the incompetence we've seen in Iraq.

I also give a lot of credit to those who did vote for him twice but regret it now, and can see both the forest and the trees just a little too late. It's not pathetic when anyone wakes up and smells the coffee. No matter how long they were fooled, it's to their credit now that they can admit it and place the blame exactly where it belongs.

The ones I really find pathetic are the Bushbots that won't admit his huge mistakes because their ego is as fragile as his is. They get up every morning, polish their blinders and put them on firmly. They are truly pathetic.

Answer 3

No. It seems as if you're saying that once someone helps vote a candidate into office, they must agree with everything the elected candidate does or be labeled pathetic. That just doesn't leave much, if any, room to evaluate the person's actions in office and form a more accurate opinion, based upon actual performance.

I didn't vote for him either time, but I know some who voted for him twice and many who voted for him the first time. It's not a scientific poll by any means, but most of those folks I mentioned are very unhappy and even angry with his administration. Some have said they'll not vote straight party ticket again... I find that very encouraging!

Answer 4

the yank human beings can argue that they have got been defective, it is authentic. The question is what are they going to do approximately it now that the genocide in Iraq has been shown to be brought about via the US' dependancy to grease. as nicely, you may no longer purely blame Bush... the US has been invading poor international locations because of the fact it stole 0.5 of Mexico interior the 1840's. How could we seem on the US inhabitants for helping activities from the theft of Mexico, Hawaii and the Philipines to the assasination of Arbenz, Mossadegh, Allende and the invasions of Viet Nam, Grenada and Haiti?

Answer 5

You may want to do your research before saying stupid things like that.
Seeing as how corrupt and crooked our current government is, do you honestly believe he was rightfully voted in, or by other scandalous means?
Even if he honestly won the vote, the general public expected that he would make the right choices, and maybe even see things through with the Iraq/Afghanistan wars. If someone starts something, we expect that person to finish it. This is a general rule of thumb here, so we kind of wanted to see our president finish his own dirty work.
Say what you want, your own ignorance will catch up with you. Viewing situations from many sides can be very beneficial to others like yourself.
Have a nice day

Answer 6

Since Bush has never been voted in by any kind of majority(popular or otherwise) then I would say they have every right to point fingers and wonder what the hell is going on.
What I do find strange is how little debate ever goes on in America about electoral reform. Any democratic system that can return a president who is so clearly NOT the voice of the majority of its people is clearly flawed. Yet come next time round they will go straight back in to putting all their faith in the same democratic process that has let them down so badly many times before.
No one can say the British alternative is any less democraticly flawed, but we do not pretend that it is, we just try to put in more checks and balances that tend not to let ego maniacs and dillusional fanatics become overnite horrors for us all to deal with.

Answer 7

The American people voted for Gore in 2000.

The Iraq debacle is Bush's fault and that's why they blame him. He insisted on this war, didn't plan properly, mismanaged it and refuses to admit his mistakes and leave Iraq. What is pathetic is Bush's lying and manipulating to get us into this war and his conduct of the war.

Answer 8

There no one to blame for the mess out there.
Just blunders and slip-ups with human errors created back in the past being expose with time after the mystery of us-911.
Just they were living in misery with communication problems at loss with our creator's universal gifts of life "The spoils of the war" from after world war two that was lost with time.
Joshua 7.11

Answer 9

Actually the republicans voted bush in twice, and the demacrats are the ones who cried about it. i still remember it, how they had to demand a recount in florida, and to this day they think they were cheated. Get over it! In my opinion Democrats always got to point fingers at the republicans.

Answer 10

Wouldn't it be more pathetic if an elected official did something horribly short-sighted and damaging to our long-term policy goals, international standing, and finanical well-being, and our response was simply "Well, we voted for him. I guess he did a good job. Keep screwing up, George- we're obligated to support you!"

Oh, and I didn't vote for him. Hundreds of millions didn't. We just have to deal with the aftermath, like those whose did.

Answer 11

First of all, over half the people who voted in 2000 did NOT vote for Bush--he won by electoral vote, that time. Iraq was not a huge American issue, then. Barely half voted for him in 2004. (I didn't vote for him either time).

Secondly, it is wiser to change one's opinion as the information one receives changes, than to hold to a previous opinion just to be stubborn.

So no, it's not in the least pathetic. As famous American Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."