Jane Fonda and her little band of Hollywood eletists took out a full page add in the New York Times to coincide with their "world can't wait" campaign. She wants to impeach Bush and Cheney for "war crimes".
The add states:
The US Government under Bush "is waging a murderous and utterly illegitimate war in Iraq"
“YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving each day closer to a theocracy, where a narrow and hateful brand of Christian fundamentalism will rule.”
“YOUR GOVERNMENT suppresses science that doesn’t fit its religious, political and economic agenda, forcing present and future generations to pay a terrible price.”
“YOUR GOVERNMENT is moving to deny women here, and all over the world, the right to birth control and abortion.”
“YOUR GOVERNMENT enforces a culture of greed, bigotry, intolerance and ignorance.”
People look at all of this and think of Hitler—and rightly so.
I guess this is nothing new though. Jane Fonda throws our troops under the bus every chance she gets.
2007-09-04 09:14:52 · 27 answers · asked by Mr. Perfect 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Here is the link.
http://www.americanvision.org/articlearchive/09-27-06.asp
2007-09-04 09:15:34 · update #1
typical liberal responses....
Can any of you people show me where I stated that she wasn't entitled to her opinion or that as one of you stated, that I said she should be hung?
ANYONE???? Just point it out for me... I would appreciate it. How about actually READING THE QUESTION!!!
Yes... I am embarassed by people like Foley and Craig... you notice how the Republicans ordered investigations into those matters... while the dems did nothing and still do nothing but defend Slick Willie for degrading the Oval Office and the office of the President.
Funny how all the super smart dems and their lawyers can't bring criminal charges against Bush... why? Because he did NOT BREAK THE LAW.
Oh... and I so agree... If I were the enemy and I saw a full page add like that by my own enemy calling their leaders and troops murderers it probably wouldn't encourage me at all.
It is sad many of you agree with a psycho like this.
2007-09-04 09:47:08 · update #2
It seems that you are getting an awful lot of far left responses, as well as some liberal views. Hanoi Jane, as she was known during the Vietnam War, associated and had pictures of herself taken with the enemy, anyone that doesn't know that the Viet Cong were communists were either to young or to stupid.
On her first statement and for the education of Kelly B
This war was authorized by the UN under UN Resolution 687,
Killing the enemy during a war is NOT Murder, those of you that want to bring up Haditha, take a look at the second link
Her second statement sounds more like there will be Christian Muslims.
Our Government suppresses LIES, such as Global Warming where less than 50% of the scientists support it, see link 3
Our government should ban Abortion, 4,000 dead babies from abortion every day, 50,000,000 since 1973
Our Government enforces Greed? Yea, if you are a Democrat
PORK Barrel Spender. (see link 4) yeah, they are reducing it but only because the election is coming.
You know if you put a little bit of a mustache on Hillary she looks an awful lot like Hitler.
And for the younger libs, Hanoi Jane with her husband Ted Traitor, I mean Turner own Communist News Network (CNN)
you know the ones that supplied Wolf Blitzer as a forward observer for Saddam during the Gulf War, telling them where our troops were, how many there were and where we planned to attack, yeah, that network.
Note to OUTCRAP or outcrop (ought to be CRAP)
Hanoi Jane is no where near being a Patriot except to the Communist Party, Benedict Arnold was a better Patriot than Hanoi Jane.
Note to History_schmistory;
Are you even aware that it was Jeb BUSH that was fighting to save Shiavo's , the ACLU jumped in to make sure she died.
Why would I be embarrassed by Michael Savage, not one of the Democrats will go on his show for a debate because they are to afraid knowing they will be torn apart. I am also not embarrassed by the response to Katrina, why the hell should I have to pay, why didn't Ray Nagin take Bush up on his offer 3 days before Katrina hit, why were all of the freaking school buses still parked. The Swift Boat vets told the truth. Kerry knew that if he got 3 purple harts, he would be sent back home.
Rinho9joe, Sorry Dude, Bush was elected, in fact he was elected twice.
You libs need to read your answers and then you will realize why your mascot is a JACKASS
2007-09-04 13:43:44 · answer #1 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Actually, unlike her stupidity during the Vietnam War, she is completely right on with these points. There was no legitimate reason or need to invade Iraq, it was a war of aggression. Our government clearly favors christian fundamentalism and pushes to combine church and state. There have been numerous instances of scientists making discoveries and statements regarding global warming that the White House has suppressed because they didn't want to hear or repeat the truth. The bush administration has damaged successful AIDS fighting programs in order to spread abstinence programs that don't work.
2007-09-04 09:25:54 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 3⤋
Are you embarrassed about Senator Craig, Foley, Ted Haggart, Bob Allen, Richard Nixon, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussilini, Warren G. Harding, Rush Limbaugh, et al?
I have my own actions to be accountable for; I cannot control the actions of others.
2007-09-04 09:33:42 · answer #3 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
You're not going to see Glass on your favorite Oakleys or Ray-Bans tomorrow". According to a .
http://www.freeoakleys.com/
2014-06-12 15:19:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They arent embarrased because deep down they feel the same way. That type of irrational ranting grounded in feeling and bitterness rather than reality helps nobody and produces nothing.
2007-09-04 13:11:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do you think they could go after Jane Fonda for her war crimes or for being a traitor?
2007-09-04 11:54:02 · answer #6 · answered by Dublin Ducky 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Good for Jane. Bush and Cheney deserve to be impeached--for war crimes AND for violating the Constitution.
Embarrassed? Not at all. The neocons seem to still think they can ride their "moral values" horse and intimidate others.
Guess what--everyone knows they have no moral credibility. And obviously, no morals.
2007-09-04 09:32:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Jane Fonda is entitled to her opinions which hold true to what her beliefs have been all along. You are entitled to yours, even if it is supporting Bush in his.
2007-09-04 09:27:25 · answer #8 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The real question should be "Are the conservatives embarassed by George W. Bush yet?"
2007-09-04 09:34:42 · answer #9 · answered by Pop D 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Are conservatives embarassed by Michael Savage? By Pat Robertson? The late Jerry Falwell? Senator Larry Craig and his bathroom gay sex trolling? David Vitter? The Terri Shiavo fiasco? The poor response to Hurricane Katrina? A poorly planned occupation of Iraq? The lying "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth?" Just wondering. Jane Fonda represents the views of Jane Fonda and that's it. Are you some kind of idiot or something, or are you merely trying to smear everyone with the termerity to disagree with you on puropose?
2007-09-04 09:23:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 6⤋