You are certainly welcome to try. That is what science is all about. People challenging the current beliefs.
You must understand though that in proving the current theory of evolution incorrect, you will only be replacing it with a more accurate theory of how life came to exist in it's current form.
I wish you good hunting and don't be surprised if during your attempts to prove it wrong, you become a believer in evolution.
2007-09-04 08:07:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
You can try but remember that if it involves religion it probably will not be accepted and if it is accepted by your teacher your grade will suffer from it. Also, something of that magnitude can take years at minimum if not decades. Darwin spent nearly 30 years on his theory. You may find something that has been overlooked for decades if you do decide to do so but it could very well make you believe in evolution. When in doubt ask the teacher.
2007-09-04 08:19:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by jcandelario31419 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
you are able to desire to be knowledgeable on the faculty point previously you're making/take such an ignorant place (ignorant in basic terms ability which you do not comprehend the info or have the learning to manage to type a actual opinion). And as a geologist, i can make it easier to comprehend that evolution is actual. So, interior the arriving years you get to stick with final year's flu vaccine and see if it nevertheless works or, gasp, have the viruses developed. of path they have developed, in basic terms such as you probably did out of your hominid ancestors.
2016-11-14 04:41:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Science (and evolution) are based on observations. It is not a belief system (like creationism). To "believe" in evolution, one simply accepts the evidence. To "believe" in religion is to take for fact statements which we cannot provide evidence for.
I personally "believe" in God, and accept the evidence for evolution.
2007-09-04 08:22:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Hammer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes you can. Just stand infront of the classroom and point at yourself. You are living breathing proof that we are not evolving, and infact prove that we are de-evolving.
Only an idiot wouldnt believe Science proven fact and even though evolution is not proven, wont acknowlege the signs that it is!
2007-09-04 08:16:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well...science is about evidence. If you wanted to prove it wrong without a doubt, you would have to gather indisputable evidence that it was wrong. So...the only other way you could really go would be proving God existed without a doubt. This doesn't mean posting a bunch of pages from the bible onto a posterboard.....this means finding absolute scientific proof that he exists.
In short....it can't be done. :)
2007-09-04 08:07:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Helen Scott 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Well, obviously you need to stay in school if you "don't believe in most of it". You're in need of further education. It would be most difficult to "prove evolution wrong"- the vast majority of responsible scientists accept the theory as correct. Proving it "wrong" would probably involve religion, and since nothing religious is provable, it would be impossible.
Also, if you "don't believe in most of it", I'd suggest that you also not take advantage of say, modern medicine, since that's all based in current biological theory. So no chemotherapy, no modern drugs, no surgery, no doctor's visits for you! Sorry!
2007-09-04 08:11:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by gilliegrrrl 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Find some people acting really stuipid like drunken fraternity dudes and compare them to chimps and suggest that the chimps are more evolved.
2007-09-04 08:07:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
OK, I once heard a statement from a anti-evolutionist who argued:
The human body's genetic strands are more closely matched to a snake's genetic strands. Therefore, those who believe that man evolved from apes would be incorrect.
Of course to back this up, you would need to provide solid proof by researching and providing the (reliable) sources you got your information from.
Note: Wikapedia is not a reliable source, the information there can be changed and added by anyone.
2007-09-04 08:09:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pamela C 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
No, because it would be bringing religion to school, and it would be a tough argument to prove... Try making a volcano...
2007-09-04 08:03:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by bonstermonster20 6
·
2⤊
2⤋