One thing that makes this easy is that x=2+t for both lines. That means that if L_1 and L_2 intersect, t must be the same for both lines at the point of intersection.
So, y=2+3t=3+4t
2+3t=3+4t
2-3=4t-3t
-1=t
Check for z:
3+t(=?)4+2t, where t=-1
3+(-1) (=?) 4+2(-1)
3-1 (=?) 4-2
2 (=) 2
So, the lines do intersect, at the point where t=-1, or
(2+(-1), 2+3(-1), 3+(-1)), or
(2-1, 2+(-3), 3-1), or
(1, -1, 2)
2007-09-04 08:30:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by El Jefe 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If they intersect, then they have a point in common. The two "x" expressions are the same, so skip ahead to the "y" expressions. Set them equal to each other and solve for t. if the same t value gives equal z values back, then the two lines have a point in common.
2007-09-04 07:40:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
as i study your question,i found out that it become in basic terms a assertion. one i believe,i could upload. if jesus' closest followers had difficulty with this asserting,it variety of feels to make experience that 2000 years later,some persons ought to nevertheless be puzzled. yet whypersistent a wedge deeper between our brothers and sisters. what approximately love,desire,longsuffering,and perseverance and solidarity. you're a sister in christ with me,and we are joint heirs to the dominion by using our lord.yet i think such as you wouldnt even have me over for lunch,or have a advantageous bible learn,because of the fact im a "protestant"...a label i dont extremely like.i choose undeniable ole christian. why the could desire to be divided.all those issues approximately we are suited,and your incorrect.....it acheives not something. im incorrect...it motives dissention,anger,and branch.all of which our father does not approve of. many advantages tebone!
2016-11-14 04:31:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋