I was under the impression that an election was a secret ballot.
2007-09-04 08:18:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by monkeyface 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
decrease than 1 / 4? No. decrease than 60% of the inhabitants, which capacity decrease than 1 / 4 voted for the labour occasion (the government.) various the lacking votes are approximately an out-of-date electoral roll. i'm a very political perosn and could circulate as far as to call myself an activist, yet there are situations while i do no longer vote as a results of fact our electoral equipment isn't representative and my vote for this reason does not count huge style. previous that, in a time of globalisation and while, after the enormous-bang liberating up financial markets, government's impression on the failings that incredibly count huge style is extremely constrained. extra may be finished by using targetting firms and helping single-concern communities and demands international justice than by using putting a go in a field for a profession politician who will toe the occasion line, whether which capacity turning in uk distant places coverage to that fool in washington.
2016-10-17 22:41:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by koltay 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Independent.
According to the news progs, No10 is now just about the only govt department that is still saying we can't have the referendum that NL promised as part of their election manifesto last time. Even his own back-benchers are saying that there should definitely be a referendum now. So, is Brownie-boy going to offer us the chance again, just to see if we'll swallow the lie a second time? Or will he pull a fast one and call a referendum followed by a snap call to the polls immediately afterwards, riding on a wave of "isn't he a nice man to let us vote on EU" popularity.
He's not daft. I bet he'd be brilliant running a marionette show. Those who vote for NL this time around will certainly let him know who's content to dance to his tune. He'll surely know that he won't have to dance to yours.
2007-09-04 11:25:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by HUNNYMONSTA 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are really only two choices BNP and UKIP. voting for New Labour is a wasted vote. Vote for someone that is listening to your concerns. At the moment mainstream voting is a vote for a one party state, the Tories will do no better. For the first time we must gel together, come out of the woodwork and make our vote count.
ATB Red
2007-09-07 06:39:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Redmonk 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
i would vote for the lib dems becabes i think they can make some postive change .and sine they have not been in power for so lone i think that they should get a chance to run this country .give the lib dems a chance
2007-09-04 09:29:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by hgiffard772@btinternet.com 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Big Fred Thompson
2007-09-04 07:46:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Hillary Clinton
2007-09-04 07:47:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Яoббiє Viє 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
bnp why because they are the only one's that seem to know what is going on in this country & what alot of people want forget the race issue they have alot of realistic policys a bit like the old labour - libs- con had untill they wanted to rule europe as well as our country
2007-09-04 08:06:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by quasar 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Independent///
2007-09-06 05:36:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thankfully we kicked labour into touch up here in Scotland so it,s really none of my concern.
2007-09-04 07:51:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋