Is there any legal remedy?

Question

'A' purchases a car and enters into Hire Purchase agreement with 'B' on a particular date and pay the first instalment in time and the said car was stolen and even after regsitering and investigating by the police 'A' is unable to traceout the car. Except the car 'A' do not possess any movables or immovables. 'B' threatening 'A' to settle the matter. What is the remedy to 'A' who is now doing labour work to maintain his family?

Answer 1

I agree with david. Just because the goods are no longer in one's posession doesn't modify the contract one entered for those goods.

If you buy a pizza with a check (which is a negotiable instrument), eat the pizza, and place a stop-payment order on the check, you'll be taken to court for the cost of the pizza (plus probably the court costs, attorney fees . . . ).

If you enter a contract, it remains valid until one party releases the other, the obligation(s) have been satisfied, or a judge rules in void (or voidable).

Answer 2

The theft of the car from A does not in anyway change the contractual agreement A has with B. This is why people have insurance.

Answer 3

If this may be a image processing business enterprise (I say this, because you reported "he as quickly as developed for the lady", which might mean he became into no longer the photographer) then they have no rights to the image after processing. extra beneficial than possibly however, you're speaking some studio that took the image and arranged the photos for the lady. if that's the case then they do carry copyright of the fabric, in spite of the fact that with no waiver signed by using the customer authorizing its use of their merchandising, i could suspect that he over-stepped his authority decrease than the copyright. The copyright is meant to guard portrait studios from having their end products scanned and revealed by using the buyer, that is it. If I have been this woman, i could practice a invoice to the studio for modeling costs and residuals for on a daily basis that her image is utilized in his reveal, as long as she hasn't signed a waiver for use or an end use settlement on the time of the sitting or while she ordered her portrait kit, he'd be complicated pressed to coach that he gained no earnings on the image. this ought to at a minimum get him to get rid of the image, whether he does not pay her invoice. If she in basic terms desires to have relaxing, she could desire to then take him to small claims courtroom to collect on the invoice she sent him. My wisdom of civil regulation is that it relies upon on basicly 2 issues, who became into the injurred occasion or who gained good thing about provider. i'm no longer a legal expert, and could propose that she touch one if she plans to pursue damages or provider costs.