Why is BUSH RESTRICTING TRAVEL RIGHTS OF OVER 100,000 U.S. CITIZENS?

Question

The freedom to travel of more than 100,000 Americans placed on “watch” and “no fly” lists is being restricted by the Bush-Cheney regime.
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/26399
Citizens who have done no more than criticize the president are being banned from airline flights, harassed at airports’, strip searched, roughed up and even imprisoned, feminist author and political activist Naomi Wolf reports in her new book, “The End of America.”
During one preboarding search, a TSA agent told her “You’re on the list” and Wolf learned it is not a list of suspected terrorists but of journalists, academics, activists, and politicians “who have criticized the White House.”

Another example of the land of the free becomming a police state?What will it take for the majorirty to wake up?

Answer 1

It appears the Conservative talking points all those years criticizing the Soviet Union about it's "lack of Freedom" was just empty rhetoric. They only hated the Iron Curtain countries because they rejected Capitalism. W.Bush, with the Patriot Act, warrantless wiretapping, "extraordinary rendition" of "enemy combatants" (that Bush can determine0 to torture chambers and Gulags, the Military Commissions Act (ending Habeas Corpus), changing Posse Comitatus and blacklisting peaceful dissenters; is quickly turning the United States into a Totalitarian State like the U.S.S.R. but without the social safety net.

Answer 2

OK first you are talking about a biased story line for information, second you are talking 100,000 out of millions of individuals, who can still travel just not in the air, and last since you are looking at a biased report, you do not have all the facts to cast judgment on if there is reason or not to have an individual on a no fly list. Maybe you should be thinking if there is any reason that you would be on such a list rather than worrying if some reporter is on a no fly list, that reporter can still drive anywhere he/she wants. Other than information passed on by Wolf, what else do you have? have you researched your comments? Or have you been so lucky as to look at the list and talk to each individual and seen the proof there is no reason? After all it is not just Bush that decides these individuals, but Homeland Security, Congress, the Senate.

Answer 3

LOL--each thing not controlled via the CFR or the MIC is a respected resource? i'm afraid i does not enable this resource interior the examine papers my scholars write, because of the fact it does practice a reliable bias. That reported, this is a solid place from which to start up finding the much greater credible components for help of what this is asserting, fairly with examples like the Kennedy detainment, which will desire to be ordinary to discover in mainstream Massachusetts papers. optimistically if Bush is honestly doing this, this is going to hit the main information shops or be stated on the internet so oftentimes that it could not be disregarded. right this is yet another resource, even though it nevertheless expenditures Wolf. so which you will could desire to look at what sort of citations/footnotes she has in HER e book to extremely make a valid argument. ETA: to ascertain that InfoWars is biased, you prefer in basic terms click on their "shop" link and see the titles that they are merchandising in e book and DVD. this is all approximately our gov't as terrorists, as a police state, etc. this is in basic terms one component of the argument, even notwithstanding if this is right (and that i'm not asserting the two way). subsequently: bias.

Answer 4

Sadly, it takes alot to wake up the majority of Americans to any serious issue. It especially hurts that the news media in the US are so shallow and ignorant. They're out to make money, not inform people, so they won't cover stories of significance until some impossible to ignore scandal comes up regarding this. Basically, nothing will happen unless and until an official commits violence against a US citizen or a celebrity is targeted.

Answer 5

That's what happens when you make threats against the president life, which is a federal offense, the extreme left are confusing there right to criticized the president to wishing bodily harm and ill will, if you don't think the SS, or Homeland is not on here reading some of these questions and answers on this site that wish the president bodily harm and threaths against his life then your sadly mistaken, if you disagree with the president on the issuses that's your right but wishing him bodily harm and extereme name calling is UN-American,

Answer 6

What kind of criticizing are you talking about?

If its "I don't think hes doing that great of a job" - then that seems a little extreme

HOWEVER, you guys seem to think that

"I hate Bush I wish he were dead" - kind foe statements as a mild form of criticizing. Hardly in my opinion

Answer 7

Do you have any legitimate source for this "news", or is it only found on fringe left-wing sites?

Don't be surprised that not many people accept the anecdotal evidence of fringe activists as proof of something.

Answer 8

I'm sure if this were true, CNN would be making a hay day out of it. If it were true, I would want to know about it.

Answer 9

I knew back in 2000 this sort of thing was likely to happen. As such I knew better than to vote for Bush.

Answer 10

That's scary as hell! This is just further proof that the US has slowly turned into a fascist state.