2007-09-04 03:16:03 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It would not matter as every single candidate would have to "cater" to the Israeli lobby in order to make any headway into the election season. They do not want to be seen as anti-Semetic or a "terrorist sympathizer," even if a candidate merely takes opposition to US subsidizing of the Israel, or any other foreign gov't for that matter. To AIPAC, any criticism of Israel is deemed anti-Semetic and they would funnel loads of money to openly smear a candidate that goes against their cause.
2007-09-04 03:29:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There will be terrorism as long as the US will support Israel. Thus vote for the candidate who will end the ties with Israel.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know who will likely win.
2007-09-04 03:24:28 · answer #2 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I will always vote for the candidate whose policy I feel best serves America.
Although I oppose excessive "foreign entanglements", if working with Israel is in the best interests of the USA, I would. Israel is still the best ally and often the only consistent one we have.
Are you an anti-semite? The word "cater" indicates that you are offended by the US-Israel relationship. What's so wrong with Israel? I've never met an Israeli I didn't like. I wish I could say the same about my countrymen.
2007-09-04 03:20:40 · answer #3 · answered by Fergi the Great 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋
YES. Believe it or not Israel is still the victim. Even if their retaliation is a bit excessive they are the victim. Israel isn't trying to take over someone Else's country. They are trying to protect their own
2007-09-04 06:25:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
in a roundabout way, Israel and AIPAC have confident the US (and a large style of of the international) that the very existence of the planet relies upon on the existence of Israel. What a load of bull! I reckon the existence of Israel in that is present day belligerent style is plenty extra of a risk to international peace than any Arab/Muslim state. (and featuring Iran) (Now enable the 'thumbs down' start up! The sheeple are outraged!) observe: ......the existence of Israel in that is present day belligerent style....... i'm no longer suggesting the 'Obliteration of Israel'.
2016-10-17 22:05:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of AIPAC, well 'nuff said. The US needs to stop being Israel's beetch.
2007-09-04 03:21:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the fate of Israel will be the last thing on my mind when i enter the voting booth
2007-09-04 03:21:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
One can hardly find a candidate who does not belong to the category outlined by you!
2007-09-04 03:23:23 · answer #8 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i sure will not vote for one that does not,israel is one of are best aillias an is gods choicen people
2007-09-04 03:22:02 · answer #9 · answered by bigdogrex 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
"Cater" sounds pretty demeaning. I prefer "alligned with Israel"....like the way we are allies with other countries.
So what's YOUR issue with Israel, anyway? Too "Jewish"?
2007-09-04 03:20:35 · answer #10 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋