Neither, he'll be similar to a Pierre Turgeon/Mike Modano/Mats Sundin type of player who hovers around a point a game for his career
2007-09-03 19:03:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Like I'm Telling You Who I A 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
he'll be an alright player. Better than Daigle, but nowhere near Crosby. Kane is a tad undersized and played well with the help of other star linemate Sam Gagner. I would say Kane can be a good NHL player, maybe a couple all-star games under his belt when it's all said and done.
2007-09-04 01:58:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He may be neither....i dont see him becoming as bad as Dagile but Crosby? I dont see him at that level either.
2007-09-04 14:38:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Kane will be next corsby.
2007-09-08 00:06:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Justin 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
well i can tell you for sure he's not gonna be the next
Crosby. he'll do fine probably won't ever be considered one of the elite players, but he seams solid.
2007-09-04 15:57:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by DC FURY 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
I really think he has more like Joe Sakic potential. I would like to see him actually play a game before I anoint him that distinction though.
2007-09-06 15:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Corey B 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Next Briere. IMO, that is the closest comparison.
2007-09-04 14:13:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bob Loblaw 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Dagile.
2007-09-04 11:05:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Nope, neither. Not expected to be, anyway. Could be good, though.
2007-09-04 02:04:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by cme 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
isn't he a wrestler?
2007-09-04 12:54:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by b d 3
·
0⤊
4⤋