When people mention Guns N Roses they never mention that theyre a supergroup> They pretty much are just La Guns mixed with Hollywood Rose. Just like VR is STP mixed with GNR.If theyre not does anybody think they should be?
2007-09-03 17:57:29 · 8 answers · asked by stewie9rulez3000 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music ➔ Other - Music
They never really were a supergroup. They just had one really successful album and then began disintegrating due to Axl Rose's unprofessional behavior. They were pretty much gone by the mid-1990s. The common definition of a supergroup is one that is formed by well-known musicians. I would say that one example of a supergroup today would be Velvet Revolver. Not only does it have three former members of Guns N' Roses but also Scott Weiland from Stone Temple Pilots.
2007-09-03 18:20:26 · answer #1 · answered by RoVale 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, a "supergroup" refers to a collection of musicians already made famous by their association with other groups, or as solo artists. The paradigmatic example is the Travellin' Wilburys.
2007-09-04 02:01:22 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan Q 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, they are not. For one, because they are gone now and true supergroups are still together. Axl is a nutjob, he stole Robert Plant's vocal style, and I hate GNR.
2007-09-04 01:05:42 · answer #3 · answered by leeloo ♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They aren't a supergroup
2007-09-04 01:10:17 · answer #4 · answered by Miss Useless Knowledge 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No they aint and hell no they should not be called one. GNR sux donky d*ck anymore dude. Even if they all regroup (which ain't gonna happen) they would not still be a supergroup
2007-09-04 01:00:29 · answer #5 · answered by Don, '80's Connoisseur 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
not even in AXL ROSE S dreams!
2007-09-04 01:08:21 · answer #6 · answered by dixie58 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I never have liked them.
2007-09-04 01:19:27 · answer #7 · answered by saturn 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are good but not that good
2007-09-04 01:02:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋