2007-09-03 17:03:08 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
So, Heaven is actually the definition of control without control, being ruled without rule, Selfish but Selfless, Truth within truth, Lawlessness with Law, Answers without Answers, Giving without Giving, Receiving without Taking, Blooming without Growing, Understanding without Learning. An acceptance of Earth is a place for that and to get it out of our system before we give up what we have been blessed by God in His image to strive for? Maybe Anarchy is the closest on Earth we can get to that without understanding?
I hope there's a playground with those things on springs that are so awesome.
2007-09-03 17:21:16 · update #1
i agree.
everyone should have known who self is, know what to do or not do, know what to know and what not to believe, follow the path and not the leaders, etc... then Ararchy whould be Heaven on Earth.
2007-09-04 04:05:48 · answer #1 · answered by sup 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd think it would be less translatable than that. I should think we would all experience it differently. If anarchy is what would help you to feel happy then, yes, that is what it would be for you. Personally, I like a little less free-for-all.
We would all be perfectly identical if we all had the same idea of perfect bliss. If there exists a "heaven", a life beyond this that consists of only pleasure and pleasure unfettered by boredom, then I would think it would consist of as many versions of it, as many realities, as there are souls in it.
2007-09-04 03:13:56 · answer #2 · answered by ophelliaz 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that heaven, as in THE heaven, is a place where like minds will be so probably not. If you're talking about an individual's heaven, I believe that is a state of mind for one to revel in. I could be wrong.
2007-09-04 00:07:49 · answer #3 · answered by volkgal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good question. What government / social order is needed in a heaven of individual souls who exist but do not 'live' together competing for "stuff" -food, riches, houses, property of all kinds?
Each soul already has everything it needs. No hierarchy is needed. No laws. No rules. Simply put, you wouldn't need
"an archy" at all.
2007-09-04 00:09:58 · answer #4 · answered by Spreedog 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe it would only be anarchy for those certain types of people, because i dont think that heaven should have a certain kind of conformity for any type of individual because that would not really be true happiness for everyone.
2007-09-04 00:07:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who knows what heaven is like? Does it really exist? Or is it just a hope that we wont simply die and thats the end of it? I don't think anyone will know untill we reach it, or don't.
2007-09-04 02:27:00 · answer #6 · answered by disTurbed angeL 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No because a main component of anarchy is lack or no athourity.
God is the authority in heaven.
therefore heaven would not be anarchy.
2007-09-04 00:06:06 · answer #7 · answered by Simmy 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My friend,
Heaven & Hell is all here. fon't expect any reward or punishment after death. be bad and suffer here with sickness and other problems. Be good and live a content life.
We will pay all the bills, here, before we die.
good luck
2007-09-07 14:22:27 · answer #8 · answered by secret society 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heaven and Hell are places on Earth.
Enjoy your life is the only one.
2007-09-04 00:26:19 · answer #9 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone just accepts the monarchy, he IS the king, you know, no one complains, no one has any earthly problems... its perfect but its not anarchy, its a dictatorship/communist system. just remember the dictator never punishes
2007-09-04 00:27:17 · answer #10 · answered by ceesteris 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋