2007-09-03 16:13:48 · 9 answers · asked by hanvis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your question makes no sense. Try again.
2007-09-03 16:18:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well The opposition of "left front"parties is sham. Forget that first. Do you know what is the deal about? Why is it called 123, what is Hyde act? What provision will help India and how? before arguing about the deal it is better to read this first. visit
www.phreewebs.com/123ndeal once. pls read ph as f as otherwise it becomes stars i.e. freewebs
Yes the deal needs to be opposed for it will put Our defence and foreign policy subservient to US. Whatever are the projected gains, this can not be the cost.
It is pertinent to note that deal is not just about Nuclear power, it allows US to penetrate our defence establishment and forces India to take stand as per their foreign policy. In fact N-Power is not the issue. West, including US, has stopped using it for last 30 years as it is exorbitantly expensive and unsafe( with the deal on, they will generously sell 30 year old junk to which they are not able to use to us). with deal, projected figure is that as we use about 3% of our power by N-fuel, we will be able use 7%. (Just the gain of %)
It is the US desire for global hegemony and needing a base in India to control Middle east and china as India is becomings more loyal and powerful than Pakistan, and Indian rulers desire to be their junior partner in regional hegemony, the deal is about.
Forget communist and US bashing, has any one given any other argument quoting the deal that it how it is useful? Have they countered the objections except saying that it is communist and US bashers, but what about the deal. please read it once it is plane English and then comment.
As for the opposition of left is concerned it is bogus. They are just staggering the issue and diffusing it to the ease of Manmohan Singh. had Pm knew that there is actually 3/4 parliament opposing the deal, he would have dared to sign it. He openly dared Left to withdraw support and Karat and yechury went into hibernation for 2 days!
There opposition is more in media than in reality. Likes of vir Sanghavi, whose intellectual level is not beyond Page 3 have hyped it much beyond reality. site is freewebs.com, it is not coming properly (freewebs.com/123ndeal)
I can discuss it further and ready to debate if the need be. contact counterpoint @rediffmail.com
2007-09-07 07:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by navya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a democracy it is very correct for the Left party to raise questions on the nuclear deal with the US. Personally, I may not agree with the Left party's stance but I will defend their right to question.
2007-09-04 00:23:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely.The 1-2-3 agreement made by Indian Govt.is only going to mortgage the whole country in the hands of the US.This is not fun.,this is a real threat to India's individuality and security.
2007-09-03 23:31:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. It's too bad the US left is too corrupted by the trappings of Empire to oppose it as well.
2007-09-03 23:52:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, no one have right to stop the India's future
if no party is ready to accept, the president intervene this
matter and do the needful for the implementation of the agreement
2007-09-04 01:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by younmanofthegarden 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not.
Does ANYTHING done by the Left so far make sense ?
Perhaps Their Masters in China may benefit.
2007-09-04 02:35:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
as you all know, the enemy to India is always within. left or right - all are the same enemies.
2007-09-04 01:45:19 · answer #8 · answered by Lavgan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
from our point of view, it may not be correct, but their point of view, it seems to be correct,
2007-09-04 02:41:22 · answer #9 · answered by Rana 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋