English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and does anyone else belive that arguing about religion and real estate is pointless, and that we should be furthering MANKIND - colinizing new planets- finding alien races, (I mean, personlly, I want to really fing other world that are habitable for humans, and learn new sciences and make the impossible possible... I want to see this world move beyond dead plants and animals for our main energy sources. I want scientists and physistist and doctors to be our heros. I want to progress into something more and not waste time with individual, insignificant personal opinions and making any one else conform to our "RIGHT" way of thinking? Anyone else out there want this kind of progression? ANyone else other look at the sky and see the beautiful blue, and then want to see that dark space above our atmosphere, and not feel so unfamilar about it?( I really mean this question not for the "dreamy artsy types"-but for those that want to see it as a reality, and what their thoughts are about it)

2007-09-03 15:33:26 · 8 answers · asked by aliaysleighbasic 3 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

I did look up what it meant, (again) i knew what it meant, i just wanted to know other folks' thoughts on it- and whay we aren't striving to become even a type 1 civ.?

2007-09-03 15:58:16 · update #1

8 answers

yes. totally.

right now we need to focus on the inner space more though I feel.

understanding quantum mechanics will give us the power, and/or shortcuts into traveling as fast or faster than the speed of light

I think this can surpass the power and ideas behind types 0,1,2,3

anyway until we break the light barrier, any type of travel and power behind it will just be too time consuming.
I mean the closes star to us is 4.2 light years away.

it would have to be a one way space colony hoping to find an island and natives that won't kill them

but overall, yes, we as humans should actually think about changing our ideas of GOD and religion into a religion of space travel preparation other wise we WILL die here on earth somehow and miss out on the UNIVERSE ...... and beyond.... Dun Dun Dun..........
type 0 - Us

type 1 – Civilization that harnesses the energy output of an entire planet.

type 2 - Civilization that harnesses the energy output of a star, and generates about 10 billion times the energy output of a Type I civilization.

type 3 – Civilization that harnesses the energy output of a galaxy, or about 10 billion time the energy output of a Type II civilization.

2007-09-03 15:53:07 · answer #1 · answered by Mercury 2010 7 · 0 0

Yes, I have had many of these same thoughts over the years, but I am a little less inclined to tolerate opinions based on ignorance and superstition, just out of a need to be nice and get along with other people.

Oh, your question: these types of civilizations are based on their technology. Much of the classification has to do with the amount of information generated and also the amount of energy consumed. It is theoretical at this point since we are the only civilization known. And sorry, but for the moment, I can't remember what classification we are.

Edit: Okay, I see now from Otis' link to the Wikipedia article that we are not quite a type 1 civilization. I really think type 1 should have been set lower, to include industrialized civilizations. Nothing wrong with having four types.

2007-09-03 15:48:22 · answer #2 · answered by Brant 7 · 1 0

Oh, yeah, the Kardashev scale! But I absolutely agree - we spend so much money on trying to kill other humans. If even a TENTH of that amount was put into Astronomy, we could start Terraforming Mars next year! I definitely want this to become a reality - stop killing people and start the mission to the stars.

I mean, at least a type 1 civilisation! That'd be nice!

2007-09-03 16:45:18 · answer #3 · answered by ryttu3k 3 · 3 0

I've heard of type 0,1,2,3 civilizations. It was on the Discovery Channel six months ago. Michael Kaku or somebody, I think.

And this kind of progression sounds beautiful. But unfortunately we have a duty to humans as humans, and many humans are suffering and need help more than we need a new planet.

2007-09-03 17:00:46 · answer #4 · answered by Echo 5 · 1 0

first i could desire to call interest to an errors you made concerning the varieties. I dont see how action picture star wars is considered a greater more suitable civilization than action picture star trek. trek tech facilitates humanity to shuttle at WARP speed on an identical time as wars tech travels at gentle speed. it become stated the millenium falcon become the quickest deliver interior the galaxy and ought to circulate .5 previous the cost of sunshine. how in the international ought to ANY CIVILIZATION accomplish something taking YEARS just to get to the subsequent photograph voltaic gadget? next, trek tech facilitates the manipulation of capability and count via transporters, replicators or maybe the holodeck. action picture star wars has not something like that. no one can argue so some distance as technologies is going action picture star trek will constantly win. the only cool units from action picture star wars is the lightsaber. on yet another subject count shall we point out international kin. trek wins returned because of the fact 1000's of worlds are at peace interior the federation. action picture star wars there is not something yet corruption and tyranny! how can that probably be a greater more suitable society? action picture star wars resembles our very own civilization immediately...different than extremely of area extraterrestrial beings we've international locations battling one yet another and because we are type 0 shouldnt they be type 2? lol. in case you extremely need humanity to realize type 2 and previous we could desire to make high quality training for loose to everyone who needs it!! information is means so we could desire to provide our childrens the final training available for a miles better the next day! in any different case we are doomed to kill ourselves off whilst our components are depleted!

2016-11-14 03:08:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your ideals are admirable, if we have any hope of surviving for any length of time on this beautiful planet everyone should take your advice. The world need about 5,000,000,000 more people to think as you do.

2007-09-06 14:56:00 · answer #6 · answered by johnandeileen2000 7 · 1 0

Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

2007-09-03 15:43:59 · answer #7 · answered by Otis F 7 · 1 0

duh

2007-09-03 16:30:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers