Okay, whatever. Bring the troops home NOW by any means necessary.
2007-09-03 13:44:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush probably won't end the war until all of Iraq's civilians have been murdered in the civil war that HE is responsible for. But since his term is more likely to end first, it looks like we're in for it for 17 months.
UNLESS we can get both him and his master, Cheney, impeached, first, for their war crimes.
2007-09-03 13:53:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 8⤋
Why dont you accursed tree huggin libbies give it a chance and stop with the perpetual defeatist - holier than thou attitude? Lets see...
1) stabilization throughout out many previous zones where insurgents attacked frequently
2) Iraqs soldiers are starting to take over many regions exclusively
3) Muqtada al Sadr has called for a 6 month hiatus
4) Bush today proposed draw down and some soldiers can come home.
How much longer will you close you eyes and ignore the reality many libtards have already accepted? That the surge is working.
2007-09-03 21:01:47 · answer #2 · answered by aCeRBic 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I was against sending the troops in the first place... now, I feel we have an obligation to try to correct our mistakes in the region, but the way Bush is running things, a total troop withdrawal would help more than it would hurt. What we really need is a government which really sees our role in this conflict as a peacekeeping one, not as a war. But what are the chances of that happening anytime soon?
We want to see ourselves as the saviors of this poor, democracy-starved people... but the ones who really need to be thanked are the neighboring countries in the region which are taking in Iraqi refugees by the millions.
2007-09-03 20:59:40 · answer #3 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, you're wrong. I know the left's policy of sticking one's head in the sand and hopeing the bad guys go away is a popular choice. But you see, Bush has this crazy idea to finish what we started and actually fight the terrorists that want to kill us, rather than give them nuclear reactors and hope beyond hope things will be okay.
2007-09-03 20:53:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
That is a fast and loose way of putting that matter. Remember it is what you believe not what is actually happening that really counts.....oh, did I wake up in 1984?
2007-09-03 21:42:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why do you want the troops home? you don't like them anyway?
go vote for your hillary, go bash the troops, do what you gotta do.
the troops volunteered. let them do what they want.
Retention (re-enlistments) are at record levels.
2007-09-03 20:56:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
When the attacks begin again after the troops come home, are you going to step up and defend your Country?
2007-09-03 20:48:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
YEs. This is like what ur 20th time asking.
2007-09-04 22:03:14 · answer #8 · answered by elle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol you haven't been attacked because there is no need. You are in the middle east. That is where the administration wanted to be. Job done. This was for penelope by the way.
2007-09-03 20:49:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
That's right. It doesn't make since but that's Bush's logic.
2007-09-03 21:04:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Promise you will never close your eyes, you just too worked up over reality.
Yeah, sometimes it happens, your are wrong.
2007-09-03 20:50:35 · answer #11 · answered by The Boss 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋