2007-09-03 13:37:12 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Desktops
the fx will be a faster processor ... but really u wouldnt notice one bit of difference in gaming or multitasking all other things being equal ... u may notice a difference in completion times of long processor intensive tasks like video converting but it wont be much ..
2007-09-03 13:44:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
FX-62 would be a bit faster because of its larger L2 cache. X2 5400+ should not be far behind because even the 2.6Ghz X2 5000+ is coming up close here:
http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/10073/5
BUT do take note that X2 5400+ is pretty efficient at 89W TDP vs the HOT FX-62 at 125W TDP.
It is the X2 5600+ that turns out surprising results here:
http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/intel/showdoc.aspx?i=3038&p=15
Beats the FX-74 in a number of games.
2007-09-03 14:05:27 · answer #2 · answered by Karz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lol those adult males have all of it incorrect.. a center 2 Duo E6550 (2.33ghz)/E6750 (2.66ghz) will certainly wreck the 5400+. you would be unable to assessment Ghz to Ghz between intel and AMD's contemporary selections considering the fact that intel's shape is lots extra powerful than AMD's
2016-12-16 10:36:15 · answer #3 · answered by rosalee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋