English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-09-03 12:43:50 · 3 answers · asked by Yerba74, Free Hugs 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

writ: Fancy term for a document issued by a court.
continuing: ongoing, not stopping.
garnishment: taking money from someones pay or deposit accounts.

The court is allowing someone to keep taking money from someone else to pay off a debt or judgment of some sort.

2007-09-03 12:53:22 · answer #1 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1 0

In answer to "what can ensue" - in case you have a judgment rendered against you, and this is extremely final, then the regulation no longer works on your want. A judgment creditor DOES have the superb to snatch money in a monetary employer account, garnish wages, place liens on materials to boot as grab materials, place the judgment on a credit rfile (which ruins your credit for approximately 7 years). in case you have been notified that a writ of garnishment has been effected on a contemporary monetary employer account, you no longer have the capability to close out the account, or to take out or upload money. In consequence, the courtroom is in possession of the monetary employer account. The money would be seized, funneled from the monetary employer account to the courtroom, and the stability would be utilized to the judgment. The courtroom then sends those money to the judgment creditor. i believe like a broken checklist in this communicate board in answering this question. yet all of us be conscious of what we are speaking approximately. the appropriate answer to what you're able to do is - SETTLE alongside with your creditor. in the event that they gained a judgment against you, the regulation works on the area of the creditor. The judgment accrues pastime, hence will strengthen exponentially year by employing year, and could be renewed indefinitely. it won't only bypass away by employing ignoring it.

2016-12-31 11:20:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It means they want to continue to garnish the wages of the defendant to satisfy a judgment.

2007-09-03 12:50:13 · answer #3 · answered by .. 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers