have you seen the 9/11 documentary the victims' families' put out, "9/11, Press For Truth"?

Question

you people who believe the official story have no reason not to watch a documentary made by the victims' families'. they have no agenda but wanting to find out the truth and hold those responsible for the attack accountable. if you refuse to watch this movie, you should be held just as accountable as bush for 9/11. because you choose to not learn the facts of the event that started the destruction of america as we all knew it. if you choose to not learn the facts, you are guilty by negligence. which is punishable in a court of law. ever heard of negligence homicide. well, by refusing to learn the truth you are putting all the rest of us in danger of the next attack this is upcoming. what kind of people refuse to even look at the evidence? are they just simply cowards?
if you love america and want 9/11 to never happen again, you owe it to all of us to at least WATCH what the media won't tell you.

here is the documentary the victims' families' put out. please take the time to watch it. you won't be disappointed. if you ever watch any of them, this is the one to watch. loose change is a joke compared to this one. this one twists nothing, just shows the facts. and asks questions. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3865048042993700360&q=9%2F11+family+victims&total=148&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=8

no i had not heard of the 9/11/07 strike. glad i have now. so that is next tuesday?

Answer 1

Interesting film I have seen some of the others mentioned on the site but this one is from the victims families perspective. Great film. It is down right scary to know what a corrupt government we have, and what lengths they will go to to wage war. It just makes me sick.

Answer 2

Yes, i watched the film recently and i was very well impressed. I don't usually buy easily the "conspiracy theories" or blindly accept the official version - actually i think it's quite hard to be sure of what really happened since we have patchy, biased and untestable information, the tip of the iceberg. But this film, instead of giving an alternative explanation for 9/11 (explaining how the iceberg is) is far from being speculative - for me, it's simply a right of citizenship - asking questions based on information that was release and demand transparent answers from the people that's suppose to serve the People. What impresses me most is that this simple exercise is not taken seriously.
Any person with good sense and a bit of critical logic will see the point of this documentary and can't possibly say it's unreasonable.
If i was in american soil and represented by US government i'd sure be supporting the strike next tuesday!

Answer 3

Didn’t Clinton have the ability to capture Bin Laden long ago? I’m surprised you don’t think Clinton had something to do with it.

This "conspiracy question or issue" has already answered by many people before....yawn. Take a look at the 2nd answer on this post which answers all your questions: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiGtwojf8th19umjE_hcAcvty6IX?qid=20070903115624AAxv7K7
In addition,
1- Controlled explosions of 9-11 WTC buildings could take a TEAM of people 3 months to demolish…PER BUILDING. Unlike the UNEDUCATED people who think that one man can somehow to it in 15 minutes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_implosion
2- It’s nearly impossible for someone to have not noticed the building’s beams were rigged with explosives…especially for a 3 month period. One of the thousands of people entering into the buildings would have tip off security,..if not, security themselves would have discovered them.
3- Bush has no access to getting 9 (3 per plane) volunteers to be suicide pilots. If you think so, prove it. Didn’t Clinton have the ability to capture Bin Laden long ago? I’m surprised you don’t think Clinton had something to do with it.
4- Bin Laden admitted that he hates America and wants to bring us down.
5- Eyewitnesses, cell records, structural engineers have testified that this was an act of plane going into the building.
Again, anyone with common sense know what happened. You might want to stick with the “Elvis is still alive” theory.

Answer 4

Have you read about the General Strike called for 9/11/07? Looks like you might be interested...

Answer 5

Spectactularly excellent. Thanks. Americans who believe the official story need to watch this film.

Answer 6

I don't think I have seen this one,but I will watch it later. I have seen 9/11 mysteries and 9/11 revisited. 9/11 was an inside job,no doubt. Something needs to change. I have posted this before but it is good......Five Reasons To Deny 911 Was An Inside Job

By Douglas Herman
Exclusive to Rense.com
2-25-7
http://www.rense.com/general75/five.htm

1.Comfort.
Comfortable people do not dissent. They rarely question authority, unless overwhelmed by fleeting pangs of conscience or momentary madness. Why would any self-satisfied comfortable person want to discomfort themselves? The whole purpose of a comfortable person is to acquire more comfort or to ensure a perpetual state of comfort. Why would comfortable people, contented with their place in the world--
a comfortable home, a well-paid job, respect within their community--
want to upset that equilibrium? Why would any comfortable person question his government about circumstances he cannot control? Why risk discomfort, disapproval, suspension from work and community scorn simply to question something like 911 that cannot be changed? To a comfortable person, that makes no sense at all.
2. Complacency.
Complacent people rarely make waves, create dissension, cause an uproar. They prefer not to talk about politics and religion, nor to do any independent thinking. Because a complacent mind is a safe mind. Complacent people prefer "to get along to go along," to swim with the tide, to run with the herd, to blow with the wind. They like to mind their own business which, on the face of it, seems like common sense and the safe thing to do. Because to get passionately involved in any cause or belief
(aside from sports)
would require a lapse of complacency. Complacency, unlike comfort, requires a more practiced inertia. To accept the state or the status quo, with mild complaint--
but only the mildest, acceptable complaint--and plod along like herd animals. To dare question the state, or debate popular consensus, is not only foolish and insane but borderline treasonable to the complacent citizen.
3. Cowardice
Cowardice is the most understandable of denials of 911. It is convenient to deny 911 out of fear, because to do otherwise, to look at the evidence presented by the most powerful empire in the world, requires a heretical leap of independent thought. A mental insurrection worthy of revolutionaries, pioneers, patriots and outraged citizens. But cowards cannot sift the evidence and arrive at an independent conclusion. They have been beaten and cowed and, at most, can only cringe and howl in derision from the rear. At every original thought or contrary opinion
(contrary to the state and the corporate media that is),
they howl and scurry away, anonymously. At best, their children may lead them, by example, into a braver realm of thought.
4. Conviction
Conviction--to be convinced of one's rightness---
and the courage to assert it, is admirable even if one is proven wrong eventually. A great many believers
(in the official story)
are as convinced of the Kean Commission version of 911, as we skeptics are of their error. These believers claim, with many, many intelligent professionals to back up their claims, that steel does weaken and melt from fuel fires and big buildings do indeed collapse, that falling concrete does indeed pulverize into micro-sized dust particles, that incompetence does not necessary indicate evil.
We truthers, in turn, claim the mass of incriminating evidence overwhelms the experts and trumps their testimony. So who is more right? Time will tell. But the only way we will ever convince these true believers
(our co-workers, friends and family)
of the falsity in the official, government version of 911 is to show them what a lying, poisonous, murderous, mercenary, fear-mongering, war-mongering, fascistic group they have put their faith in. And every day more and more disgruntled citizens are becoming convinced we may have a point.
5. Collusion
A secret activity undertaken by two or more people for the purpose of FRAUD.
The definition of collusion. The US media colludes every day. They collude with the White House or Pentagon or State Department to perpetrate some fraud or other. And many of us collude right along with them. The smallest group of 911 deniers, numbering several million, which I call the Colluders, includes many who have worked for the US government, still work for the US government, receive huge chunks of money from that government to fund their work, depend on contracts from the US government and, more often than not, support the official US government line. Many of them, working high in the US government--NSA, FBI, CIA, Pentagon officials---
know exactly what happened on 911 but keep quiet. Colluding all the way to the bank. Privately they may not agree with many aspects of the official version but, publicly, they will NOT utter a single statement, will NOT go on record, publicly, with a single dissenting word. Not while there is money to be made. And so, of all the 911 deniers, they are most complicit with the crime.
Comfort. Complacency. Cowardice. Conviction. Collusion. And sometimes a combination of all of them.
Footnote: A tip of the cap to those activists at 911Blogger.com Not only do I read the columns posted there but the remarks (an addiction) and sneers from the trolls. This column is dedicated to the 911 activists everywhere, in recognition of the five types of people you run up against every day--and I mean against.

Answer 7

Wow! Put the crack pipe down.