whats the difference between a terrorist, a freedom fighter, and an insurgent?

Question

this time I spelt it right

Answer 1

Uniform!~!

Answer 2

it depends who is doing the assessment. IRA were freedom fighters to their supporters, terrorists to the UK Gov, and insurgents to the Irish. Inthe current world climate the question is 'are muslims freedom fighters, terrorists or insurgents?'
According to CNN, Bush and Bair, they are pretty much all terrorists. According to Aljazeera, freedom fighters. Which channel do you watch and which channel dictates your thinking? It's a rich world and thanks to the internet people are starting to ask difficult questions which Bush and Blair can no longer justify. Are the american forces in Iraq, terrorists, freedom fighters or insurgents. If they are freedom fighters whos freedom are they fighting for whenthey have killed over 200,000 of the local civilian population? If they are terrorists why does the the UK and the world condone them? If they are insurgents why dont they speak Arabic and have any ties to the region apart from oil and money? To middle easterns, they are without doubt just terrorists - the new world empire, intent on world domination.

Answer 3

Or a U.S. military person? Depending on whose eyes you are viewing the situation through, everyone is a terrorist, yet no one views themselves as terrorists, they each are only doing what they think is right. Terrorists were the Germans in Europe during the second world war. Freedom fighters were those civilians who fought the Germans. Insurgents are the civilians who sided with the Germans.

Answer 4

Well, a Freedom Fighter is fighting for Freedom from Oppression.

A Terrorist is someone who uses terror, to scare a population, most often a civilian population into affecting change that they would not normally support.

An insurgent is a civilian who is fighting to destabilize a government or system of rule in an area.

You can have Insurgents who are Freedom Fighters.

Answer 5

The terrorist lives in a white house while the freedom fighter has no house. an insurgent can be both.

Answer 6

The difference between a Freedom Fighter and an Insurgent is the person you ask.

The difference between a terrorist and the other two is the method. (Terrorist means to spread terror, fear)

Answer 7

Terrorist - The new street kids on the block as casualty of the dead Mummy with expression a the Son of a dirty old man from the graveyards of failures and horrors of the past with the glory in idol worshiping the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Luke 6.39, 41-45
Insurgent - same as above.
Luke 9.60
Freedom fighter - Only out there when our creator is at work.
With expression of the Son of God with success in worshiping God.
With "The winner takes it all"
With the Liberation of Freedom for the good of mankind in the creation of peace on earth goodwill to men on planet earth.
Luke 9.55-56

Answer 8

An insurgent is a resistance fighter, A terrorist is a freedom fighter and a Freedom fighter is a terrorist. That is it really.
Nobody really says that that group (except itself) is a freedom fighter.

Answer 9

Perspective, freedom fighter if its your side, insurgent if fighting against you, Terrorist, if fighting against you by unorthodox means. Our founding fathers were called Terrorists by King George and fought as insurgents against his rule.

Answer 10

CNN calls terrorists "insurgents."

Al Jazeera calls them "freedom fighters."

Answer 11

effortless. while they are struggling with for the liberty of their human beings which many concept the Afghans doing in Afghanistan yet having gained the rustic, they became the rustic right into a genocidal detention center camp lots worse the Russian puppet regime ever replaced into. They went from freedom combat to terrorist. additionally, freedom combatants combat they do no longer kill women and childrens and desire to win by ability of horror. the yank revolution replaced into no longer approximately killing the families of persons, they have been approximately pushing the British out of the colonies. Clearlyfreedom combatants can inflict injury on contemporary armies yet terrorists choose for instead to explode college buses and girls contained obtainable to purchase foodstuff for their fafamilies you do no longer see that and function come to settle for that killing of noncombatants is high quality and surely you have the choose to make it look noble and courageous. Seven 365 days old little ones on college buses are no longer lots of available on your "terrorist/freedom fighter" and adult males on their thank you to their jobs are no longer armed so as that they are effortless objectives. Thats the adaptation. once you're saying jap u . s . a . you propose Boston and the Irish community, thats no longer united statesa. or individuals those are people who're purely hiding out someplace else cuz its risk-free. no person ever reported as the Viet Cong terrorists, they werefightingg of their usa against a distant places military. Blowing up workplace homes or resorts and concentrated on unarmed people who have no particular dedication to something is purely cowardly habit.