English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Mate of me was trying to convince me that black holes in space fart and produce matter elsewhere in the Universe or the Multiverse and that is how the Big bang happened. If this is true I was wondering how it equates to the string theorists current idea that the Big Bang was created by the collision of two 11th dimensional membranes.

2007-09-03 09:26:17 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

Spotlight, you've obviously not seen the "Picture the Loan" advert. And I'm sorry the Devil made me type me instead of mine as the third word, but I'm really looking forward to the next series of Horizon to see what they make of all this other than platitudes, incomplete interviews with somebody who might know and "groovy graphics and background music"..

2007-09-03 09:46:19 · update #1

21 answers

You are asking an incomprehensible question that no one on earth is qualified to answer. My theory on it though is that when black holes collapse and atoms are broken down in to smaller units that this actually creates space. I think the big bang was the death of a star that imploded to create another universe. It logically makes sense to me and cannot easily be proved impossible. This is actually called the whitehole theory but I thought this up long before the whitehole theory was recognized. Hope this helps. CYA

2007-09-03 09:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by justask23 5 · 0 0

Well, it would appear that black holes are strange in that the bigger they are, the less they fart. Don't blame me, blame Stephen Hawking.

Before him, we were all convinced that "black holes have no hair" (hey, this is a real issue, go check wiki); now, we are supposed to understand that we could be in the "presence of non-abelian Yang-Mills fields, non-abelian Proca fields, some non-minimally coupled scalar fields, or skyrmions; or in some theories of gravity other than Einstein’s general relativity."
(No, I could not make this up)

As far as a black hole being connected through a worm hole to another place where matter spews out, check out "white hole". The problem is that the event horizon of a white hole recedes from the universe at the speed of light, so that the matter being spewed out is always further and further away from the observer.

A bummer if you are waiting for your 1955 Ford Fairlane to come back (which, in this context only, could put the white hole in Australia).

-----

Justask23 mut be very old as white holes were described by Einstein and Rosen in 1935.

2007-09-03 11:10:44 · answer #2 · answered by Raymond 7 · 0 0

some have reported that the result may be the destruction of your street or probable extra effective - that's maximum probable actual. I actual have a humorous feeling in spite of the undeniable fact that that for what it does not harm would be left bent right into a place of being sucked in the direction of the black hollow. the clarification i've got faith that's because of the fact I look to remember interpreting someplace that a black hollow has the potential to even bend the gap around it! you should image this by drawing a grid line onto area on your head. the place the black hollow is, the nothingness around it curves in the direction of it - the grid line curves. i can not say i truly understand what the respond is or if what I actual have reported is carefully superb as memory can each and every so often be a deceiver. yet evaluate that I an basically thirteen and that i've got my finished lifestyles past to me to study extra with regard to the character of physics.

2016-12-16 10:26:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

that theory doesnt have anything to do with string theory. the theory he is talking is proved wrong becuase it violates the second law of thermodynamics.

the theory was that there are millions of other universes. and that inside of a black hole was a wormhole that led to a white hole in another universe. and all of the matter that came into the black hole was released through the white hole into the other universe. and that our universe is just the inside of a black hole with a white hole in the center. like i said, its not popular anymore.

and just on a side note. string theory is slowly losing popularity also.

2007-09-03 09:32:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Justask23 has a collection of RED DWARF series four aired in England in the late eighties/early nineties, they had an episode called 'White Hole' which uses the exact theory you've asked about in its dialogue. Very funny comedy it is too!

2007-09-04 02:12:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Black holes release radiation(Hawking Radiation) whichwhich really starts from outside of it but ends up as though it came from inside.So blacck holes that are not engulfing things slowly evaporate. .

2007-09-03 13:05:07 · answer #6 · answered by jonal 7 · 0 0

This sounds to me like a very confused question from a very confused person. Also, why do the first 3 words in the question's explanation not make sense?

2007-09-03 09:32:49 · answer #7 · answered by Hehe 2 · 0 1

You are asking if a collapsing star, which becomes a black hole, can fart? Well, I can go to bed now, I have seen it all!

2007-09-03 11:17:24 · answer #8 · answered by lytnyngryder 4 · 0 0

only a few physicists actually believe that matter gets transported from one black to another, and that tranportation has almost nothing to do with the big bang

2007-09-03 09:32:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, it only sounds like it. They have been heard emitting very low frequency vibrations, about 50 Hz (cycles). If you heard one that deep in the room where you're standing, run.

2007-09-03 18:32:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers