1) The 2007 version of the 2006 White Sox.
2) So much talent - so little success.
3) Just plain bad. Sorry we let you down.
2007-09-03 06:48:07 · 16 answers · asked by ? 4 in Sports ➔ Baseball
2
It's not 1 because they didn't win the World Series.
It's not 3 because their not a bad team.
2007-09-03 06:51:12 · answer #1 · answered by Choro-Kun 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
2
2007-09-03 13:50:07 · answer #2 · answered by Samantha 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3
2007-09-03 13:50:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hmmm, I guess #2 would be the closest, even though plain bad luck would be higher on the totem pole of answers.
They're only 3 games outta the wild card race and 5 games behind the Indians. They still control their own destiny.
There's so many strong teams in the AL this year. The AL Central has the toughest schedule I think, aside from the ChiSox who have been crappy lately, but still a decent team. The Indians and Twins we know can win. And the surprising Royals can contend with most of the AL elite when they're clicking.
2007-09-03 13:59:26 · answer #4 · answered by Brandon 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll go with Salty LOL
It's the 3rd, not the 30th. They are 3 out of the WC. Get a grip!
Put the choke artist label on them in 3 weeks if they continue to grab 7 run leads and blow them.
Until them - lighten up
2007-09-03 14:39:19 · answer #5 · answered by pricehillsaint 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
# 2
2007-09-03 13:51:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about (4) They play in the American league. Give them some credit. Playing the best teams in baseball night after night is not easy. I mean if they were in the National league, I'd say they sucked. Which the National league does suck.
2007-09-03 14:35:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
4) Vastly Overrated
2007-09-03 13:51:13 · answer #8 · answered by hank_718 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
4. All of the above.
2007-09-03 16:20:42 · answer #9 · answered by Oz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say
4) it aint over til its over
2007-09-03 14:42:16 · answer #10 · answered by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋