Are royal families around the world competing??

Question

And i mean competing for the most publicity and the most attention? It's seems that most love the media attention (royals of UK) whiles others are forgotten and you hardly hear anything about them (royals of monaco). Others however, don't particularly like media attention (royals of Japan). But what do you think the royals are thinking whenever they swith on their TV and see another monarch on their channel? do they get jealous? or feel that they need to also get some attention???

yes Big A, but there are other white royals in europe and the they aren't the richest royals in the world. In the forbes top ten richest royals, the brit royals are #10.

Answer 1

The "bicycle monarchies" in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway as well as the Netherlands don't have near the money allotted them by their parliaments that the British monarch does. However, Juan Carlos, the King of Spain, seems to keep a fairly high profile, perhaps because the Spaniards are use to the cult of personality started by Franco. Part of the mystique of the Japanese monarchy is that it keeps a very cloistered life.

Presumably, the press in these countries covers their monarchies, but it doesn't make the International news. Of course, more people worldwide speak English than Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Dutch, or Japanese as a second language, so the media is more likely to focus on the British Royals.

Answer 2

I can just simply imagine that within royal families there are those that crave attention and ones who would rather be left totally alone by the media and the public ! They, after all, are human beings and that is fairly much the way things are generally with the world at large --- some that HAVE to have the spotlight on THEM at almost any cost -- and ones that had rather the whole world just go away and leave them in peace !
Within some royal families, I would believe, the ones that would be -- "out there" -- seeking attention or causing a stir -- are kept fairly much "in check" by the heads of these families (they after all control the family's wealth and affairs)
But, when you look closely at this subject -- the ones that seem to get most all of the attention -- are ones that are out within the public domain more, anyway -- leading very active lives of involvement in public affairs and activities -- and therefore -- more accessable !!
I can't imagine that "royals" are all that much different in a lot of ways from the run of the mill wealthy when it comes to the things that make up their personal interests and daily lives, though ---- I would think that they are (on a personal level) just as preoccupied with serving their own little list of thrills, and egos --- and jockeying for the little things that are Oh So Important -- at the moment !!
I truly don't believe that there is any real "competition" going on here in any respect whatsoever !!

Answer 3

Its the damn media, all they focus on is the UK royal family, like there the only royal family in the world, just because there white, rich, and live in the UK. Theres probably families that are more important than they are

Answer 4

1. I think for a man of his size, obviously he wasn't not the most agile creature. But taking all of those things into consideration, he was a pretty good wrestler. He hails from a long line of professional Samoan wrestlers. 2. I think that his feud with Kane really put him on the map. While his feud with Cena made him a "house hold name", I think without the feud with Kane he would've never been able to have the feud with Cena. 3. Hmmm, I think it would've been interesting for him to have matches with some of the younger guys who have recently come up. Sheamus might have been a interesting match. Two different styles of wrestling, but both men are good at their style.