Everyone beats down on Bush, but what on earth does everyone want him to do??? The entire world is gravitating towards war: someone has to fight, someone has to save us all from these terrorists that are mucking up our lives and I think Bush has the right approach.
America's a big and powerful country and we as the world count on it to fight on our behalf.
George W. Bush is a noble man to me. What do you guys think?
2007-09-03 03:00:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I hear you man, yeah people are always down on him. I think he is just like everyone else. the big thing is that most people who dispise him think this way because of the way he handled the Osama bin laden case. Some believe we shouldn't ever have gone to Iraq, I sometimes believe it too. But what else were we going to do in afghanistan? we bombed the s@#t out of that place and came up pretty short handed. yeah we got a few of the taliban leaders and follows out but, most people think we should have stayed there longer and continued to bomb the holy hell of the place. Turning to Iraq was at the time something we had to do for the UN because the now ousted idiot Saddam Hussein wouldn't let the UN inspectors in and do the job they were to do. Which was part of the peace agreement he had signed at the end of desert storm.
2007-09-03 03:29:12 · answer #1 · answered by heavyhauldad 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He may be a great guy to have at a barbecue or a tailgate party, but that is NOT the guy you want leading the country and dealing with complex matters. He hasn't an ounce of gravitas. He cannot speak a simple sentence without at least two grammatical errors.
If "the entire world is gravitating towards war," it's because Dubya screwed up the war in Iraq so badly. He forgets that 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 came from Saudi Arabia. He is incapable of admitting he screwed up and will keep blundering along until January 20, 2009, when he can pass the mess he made off to someone else--as he has done his entire freaking life. It's because we invaded Iraq that there are terrorists there.
And the United States should not have to be the world's police force. We have enough problems in our country; we need to put our own house in order before we start telling other countries how they should be run.
2007-09-03 16:34:44 · answer #2 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
any USA president would have had to defend the country after 9/11 going after bin ladin was the only logical thing to do
but but despite that bush is a gaff prone draft dodging doofus.
he can barely open is mouth with out making a prat of himself.
genuine bush quotes
Thank you all very much. Please be seated, unless, of course, you don't have a chair.
There -- it's -- you know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror
There's an old saying in Tennessee -- I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee -- that says, fool me once -- shame on -- shame on you. You fool me, you can't get fooled again
I'm a strong proponent of the restoration of the wetlands, for a lot of reasons. There's a practical reason, though, when it comes to hurricanes: The stronger the wetlands, the more likely the damage of the hurricane."
'Families is where our nation finds hope, where wings take dream.'
'I know how hard it is for you to put food on your family.'
'Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?'
2007-09-03 05:07:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Gw is a nice guy, too, but a terrible leader. When the decision to go into A'stan was made, I agreed with it whole-heartily. But, then GW decided to divert almost all of the troops from A'stan to Iraq for reasons that have now turned out to be lies. That is why everyone is bashing him. All the casualties in Iraq have been for nought.
2007-09-03 07:24:40 · answer #4 · answered by kenoplayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not even close. the top of the battles in the two Iraq and Afghanistan have been whilst the final public of enemy warring parties died. via some estimates, as many as 500,000 Iraqi infantrymen and civilians died and yet another a hundred,000 Afghans decrease than Bush. decrease than Obama this is been greater smaller conflicts and IED's , drones that have completed the killing.
2016-11-14 01:53:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone beats down on Bush, That's perhaps because all we hear about is war. He is just like his father before him, I keep hearing they are war mongers. Is this true or just peoples opinion.
2007-09-03 03:18:53 · answer #6 · answered by paphole 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with ya. He's the guy to blame for whatever seems to be ailing America these days . . . but then again, that's the job he signed up for. The President gig is not an easy one . . . I don't know why anybody would want it.
2007-09-03 04:28:39 · answer #7 · answered by eljude 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A real president wouldnt send the the troops to Iraq especially when he already knew that there wasnt crap squat out there to get! There's not frikin secret weapon over there >.< We're jus fighting for nothing. As for the New Orleans incident no one's doing crap down there to help reconstruct that place! The only person who Ive seen so far try to help was Oprah...and thats suppose to be the presidents job! And a real damn president sure wouldnt plot 9-11 to occur, so that he could scare everyone into wanting to go to war..and here we are now...in war...which may NEVER stop till probably the next 6 years! who knows!? but w/e I dont care what anyone says...Bush isnt doing what he's suppose to....America is f-ed up anyways..and the reason is obvious, but Im not going to do into that...
2007-09-03 03:26:49 · answer #8 · answered by Jess 3 · 1⤊ 5⤋
He seems cool to me too
2007-09-03 03:07:11 · answer #9 · answered by xxyummy_mummyxx 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You can't be for real! Look how Clinton handled it when they bombed or Embassy's and killed all those people!
He, what? He didn't do a thing----------NEVER MIND!!!!!!
2007-09-03 03:13:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋