Why do Bush supporters call Hillary a "Dictator" when it's Bush all along?

Question

Why do they call the Bill Clinton's presidency "8 years of hell" when Bill disarmed Saddam without firing a single shot, won in Yugoslavia with a REAL international coalition, Had a REAL economic boom and had a $10 TRILLION surplus, and gasoline was .89 a gallon?

The funny thing is all the spying and Patriot Act thing that Bush created is about to be used AGAINST them when a MOTIVATED Bill Clinton uses it to investigate Oil Corp and Bush/Chaney collusion to start the Iraq war based on lies for high oil profits.

What goes around comes around.

I guess anyone who calls that hell is a war profiteer or an oil corp flunky. They sure ain't rational or normal.

Answer 1

I suspect there are a number of reasons why Republicans would call HRC a dictator. First of all, I think they believe she would be effective and therefore a threat to their interests. Second, they didn't like the idea of a First Lady who did more than bake cookies and entertain guests, so they certainly won't like her making the earth-shattering precedent of being both the first female president and the first president who was a "first spouse" of a previous president. She would be the Democrats' American answer to Margaret Thatcher.

Many Republicans are from the South, and the South never has had strong positive feelings about New York, which she represents in the Senate.

Answer 2

First off, Hitlery, uhm I mean Hillary is a socialist.

Second off, your numbers are off there.

Third Clinton launched missiles against Iraq when his case was coming up with the entire Lewinsky thing (you know I did not have relations with that women, thing, but oops there a dress with his "seed" on it.)

Fourth, I don't know if I would call Yugoslavia a win, and the International Coalition went like this, "America you provide all the troops and we [other countries minus the Brits] will give you substandard ammo).

Fifth, 10 Trillion LMAO.

Sixth 89 cents a gallon, Clinton was president in the 80's?

Do I need to go any further and pull it apart point by point or are you feeling well enough to just admit defeat?

Answer 3

Jealousy.Bush supporters have a hard time dealing with the truth of the failure this pseudo Christian has brought to the white house
But say the Clinton name they really loose all sense of reality.Reason is they are jealous and still frustrated that he remained popular and successful despite all their mudslinging.They are used to defeating Democrats like that,think Kerry but earlier Dukakis.
In Congress, Clinton was thwarted by the reactionary conservative majority in virtually every attempt he made to pass legislation that would attack al Qaeda and terrorism. His 1996 omnibus terror bill, which included many of the anti-terror measures we now take for granted after September 11, was withered almost to the point of uselessness by attacks from the right; Jesse Helms and Trent Lott were openly dismissive of the threats Clinton spoke of.

Clinton was a very good American President who was liked and respected around the world.Bush deserves impeachement.
In the Bush administration "the negation of truth is so systematic. Dishonest accounting, willful scientific illiteracy, bowdlerized federal fact sheets, payola paid to putative journalists, 'news' networks run by right-wing apparatchiks, think tanks devoted to propaganda rather than thought, the purging of intelligence gatherers and experts throughout the bureaucracy whose findings might refute the party line -- this is the machinery of mendacity...The point here is not the hypocrisy involved, though that is egregious. The point is the downgrading of truth and honesty from principles with universal meaning to partisan weapons to be sheathed or drawn as necessary. No wonder the Bush administration feels no compunction to honor the truth or seek it; it conceives truth as a tactic, valuable only insofar as it is useful against one's enemies

Answer 4

All of your "facts" are skewed if not downright falsehoods. Mr. Bush isn't , never was a 'dictator". And Clinton sure didn't get Osama when he had the chance and now Afhganistan is looming as a larger problem than Iraq. It's all in pereception according to your statement....please go to facts next time!

Answer 5

Although many Republican voters perceive that Republican officials are not delivering on their promises, these voters have been brainwashed into believing that Democrats are devils. At this point, they will believe many improbable lies about Democrats. This allows them to remain in their party with some degree of comfort.

Answer 6

The three of them are war criminals, and I hope and pray that one day they will face justice, please God. And I would like to add that the Austro-Hungarian Empires attack on Serbia (which started WW1), Hitler's attack on Poland (which started WW2) NATO's Jihad against Yugoslavia and Republika Srpska and the occupation of Iraq by the US-are all the same **** made by different assholes.

Answer 7

It’s due to a psychological defense mechanism known as “projection.”

Bush supporters project the concept of dictatorship onto others, such as Hillary, because they can’t face the thought that they are supporting a would-be dictator who has abused his power and tried to trample the Constitution.

Answer 8

bill disarmed Saddam????
http://youtube.com/watch?v=tVXwSsRoJp8

Watch the video your hero did no such thing.

And hillary is a SOCIALIST. Plain and simple.

Answer 9

Thank you for one more glimpse into Bush Derangement Syndrome. BTW, given how bad your "facts" are, I'm guessing you work for the NY Times.

Answer 10

Because Hillary is a Dictator, with cloven hooves.
And....your facts are fact-less.
Sounds like Terrorist Propaganda.