English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you really think that being emotionally needy is an excuse for multiple affairs ? Ok so Charles was a twit but atleast he only cheated once because he married the wrong women.

2007-09-02 23:51:45 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Royalty

8 answers

I was never terribly concerned about her or her affairs, until she helped contribute towards the marriage break up of Will Carling and his wife Julia. It's one thing to have 'discreet' liaisons, but when you knowingly hurt another person, and seem to have little or no remorse for your actions, and then bleat on and on ad infinitum about your own 'personal' hurt, well it's hypocritical and any sympathy I had for her evaporated.

2007-09-04 05:28:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If anything Charles affair was worse than Diana having many affairs (if its true) because his began long before he married & continued all through his marriage.
Diana was young & naive when she married & probably thought she could change him but since he even spent his last night of his single life with Camilla it did not bode well for the future. Diana probably realised too late that she was little more than a brood mare for his need to produce an heir & a spare. Once that duty had been fulfilled Charles no longer made any pretence about Camilla so Diana was perfectly within her rights to reciprocate in kind.
If she was immoral then so was he.

2007-09-03 15:31:43 · answer #2 · answered by monkeyface 7 · 1 1

One indiscreet affair that came to the public's attention was too many, which if it didn't make her immoral, made her unseemly (at least according to the mores of the British aristocracy--a set never very good on keeping the 7th Commandment). Unfortunately, the Royals still practice an age-old, chauvinist tradition whereby the husband is allowed to have a mistress or mistresses while the wife must refrain from adultery.

For example, Queen Victoria's son and heir, Edward VII, was noted for his sexual indiscretions, but his wife, Princess Alexandra of Denmark, resigned herself to accept them, even allowing his last mistress, Alice Keppel, at his dying bedside. Incidentally, Mrs. Keppel was the great-great grandmother of Camilla Parker Bowles. Among Bertie's other mistresses were Lilly Langtry, Jennie Churchill (Winston Churchill's mother), Daisy Greville, Sarah Bernhardt, La Belle Otero, and Agnes Keyser.

2007-09-03 10:25:28 · answer #3 · answered by Ellie Evans-Thyme 7 · 0 2

12

2007-09-03 06:59:05 · answer #4 · answered by hb kitten 4 · 2 2

Probably many but who knows. She knew what she was getting into and went for it. Charles is married to the love of his life and I think it's a great love story. Too bad he didn't marry her in the first place. Diana represented herself well but did not represent the royal family well at all. The people she was with and how she died tells the true story of Diana.

2007-09-03 12:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I think it makes her human. She didnt have her husband at her side he was emotionally unavailable. The marriage was a farce to which she was unaware which makes it even more sad. It is not right to judge another till you have walked in their shoes. Oh how did you know Charles wasnt continuing to see Camilla. Please you are being biased and judgemental on a very good woman. She was looking for love like we all do.

2007-09-03 07:04:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

she was married to one man,
she obeyed him and
in the first time
trusted him

2007-09-03 07:23:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

She's dead, leave it alone.

2007-09-03 07:03:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers