No such thing, never has never will.
2007-09-02 23:38:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
it become maximum under no circumstances began via an elephant. this is in basic terms some looser attempting to sell a stupid tale to the papers. i stay in basic terms over the hill from loch ness and function studied the creature. there have been sightings of the loch ness monster long long long previously all that elephant stuff. the fist and maximum well known sighting become via st columba like over 1000 years in the past. there have been others between then and the Nineteen Thirties whilst each and all the media stuff began. the loch ness monster is a water horse. whilst will they learn? water-horse is a shape shifting creature that lives in lochs. try typing water-horse into wikipedia or something in case you have an interest to ascertain greater, although the pointers on there is not the final. being a shape shifter, nessie is able to circulate undetected.
2016-11-14 01:41:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
scientists have proven that the Loch Ness sea monster does not exits for the following reasons....
1) it would require 10 of its kind to maintain its existance
2) the water is so cold it has to be constantly moving which would make it have to come up for air every 10 mins.
3) There are no caves for her to hide in so when scientists run sonar over the loch they should have found her considering the sonar would pick up the air in the creatures huge lungs.
4) it is a great predator like a crocodile but there have been no reports of dead or missing animals or people.
2007-09-05 22:21:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Braedyn is due 5/8/08! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is supposed to be dinosaur that made it after the commet.
It has apparently been sighted in other countries too.
I heard about one in America somwhere, One in Japan, and one in the Hawksbury River in Australia and one was apparently washed up in New Zealand.
I don't know if it is real. I would like to think it might have existed after the commet.
But I do not know.
Have you done a search on yahoo or google for it?
2007-09-03 02:42:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe the majority of these creatures 'cryptids' may exist. The reason they have not been proven by science is they may be spiritual creatures. These being are able to take any form at will, they could also become invisible to the human eye and more. According to the Bible we are not always dealing with flesh and blood beings. A great web resource on these creatures is:
http://www.Unknown-Creatures.com
2007-09-03 03:35:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm inclined to believe the argument that there's simply not enough food in or around Loch Ness to support any kind of large aquatic organism (or group of organisms) on the scale of 'monster'. I think it's just hoaxes and wishful thinking.
2007-09-02 23:43:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Okay, I don't know what it is, and I really don't have a theory, per say, but I do believe there is something there. Maybe a prehistoric throwback, perhaps an overly large eel or fish of somekind, or just a species that has not yet been discovered.
But I do believe . . . . I do believe
2007-09-03 03:59:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by eljude 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
If it is real I hope we never find it. AS far as not enought food there could be underground water ways that lead to the sea allowing these things to move back and forth. Remanber the money pit on oka island.
2007-09-03 21:24:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by raven blackwing 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I met a bloke in the pub once who said he'd definitely seen the loch ness monster a few years ago. It happened just minutes before he flew to Neptune on a golden swan and had a tea party with the yeti sitting half way up a bubble gum tree.
2007-09-03 01:10:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Its real.Yo.Im from around the Loch area.And ivr seen err wit me own to eyes.
2007-09-03 04:21:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by imachristian1 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly some undiscovered lake creature, maybe a giant eel or something.
2007-09-03 01:45:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋