"...everybody seems satisfied with how much they have of it."
Let's assume you had the possibility to become more intelligent (or less, if you like) for a special REASON.
When your wish is fulfilled, would that REASON still be valuable or relevant? Wouldn't you think different about being dumb or smart as soon as your intellect changed?
If yes, can that then be taken as proof of correctness for the statement above? What else are its implications?
If no, what then changes with the change of your intellect? And what would be better / worse if you were dumber / smarter than you are now? How would your life change? Is it really only a matter of "survival of the fittest"?
2007-09-02
21:07:44
·
11 answers
·
asked by
baerchen80
3
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Julien, no, going back to the old state of intelligence was not part of the question.
Tony, the quote is only interesting, because most people would not choose "more intelligence" as one of three wishes granted by a fairy, but rather things like "peace on earth" or "$1billion".
So the actual question is: Is intelligence of any importance for survival at all? Beyond Evolution, what reason would one have to bother about their intellect, when any person, dumb or smart, is believed to have a place in the world today?
Religions rule the world, not science, right? Remember "In God We Trust" on the $-bill. "So far as I know, there is no word in the gospels in praise of intelligence." (Bertrand Russell) So what is intelligence worth anyway?
FYI, I am an atheist and monist, through and through. But since I'm quite lonely with that opinion, considering the "popularity" of religion(s), I was wondering if Nietzsche really was right:
2007-09-05
17:51:35 ·
update #1
"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself."
Guess I tried to come in through the back door...
2007-09-05
17:52:20 ·
update #2