To all the ppl who think it was a conspiracy, this question is for you:
I dont exactly know how to phrase it, but, What are you trying to say when you say it was a conspiracy? I mean, who do you blame for it? I just dont undersatnd how it COULD be a conspiracy. I watched all these videos on YouTube. Some were actually pretty convincing like when they showed the pentagon (i think it was that building) blow up, but there was no plane.
Well, anyway Can someone please answer and explain?
2007-09-02 18:50:28 · 11 answers · asked by Love, Me 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
People say it is a conspiracy because alot more happened on that day then we were told.That the official version makes no sense.How can two planes cause the collapse of three steel buildings?Especially when the last one looked like a controlled demo?Why is it that when ever supporters of the official version call a questioner a lib loon they direct you to a popular mechanics article about how they fell?Instead of any official government site?
2007-09-02 19:19:23 · answer #1 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No matter what you believe, you still believe that 9/11 was a conspiracy. Simple logic should tell you that. Conspiracy= illegal act committed and planned by 2 or more ppl. The official story is a conspiracy theory as well. You just have to examine both theories and find which one fits the facts better. There is really too much to list.
2007-09-03 02:00:50 · answer #2 · answered by Luke F 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
okay when people say 9/11 was a conspiracy the believe that the terrorist actions were carried out by their own country. eg. many believe geore bush was behind the atrocities.so that he could gain control of the middle eastrens richest states . there is much proof that al qaeda memebers carried out the attacks against the 4 targets which also include a confession by the alleged mastermind khalid sheikh mohammed and pre- martyrdom videos by two of the hijackers, mohammed elamir awad elsayed atta(flight 11) and ziad jarrah(flight 93) who were 2 of the suicide hijackers
2007-09-03 01:59:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
How much evidence do you need for it not to be a conspiracy?
I blame the New World Order that papa Bush first mentioned in a speech on September 11th, 1990.
2007-09-03 02:21:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why don't you ask the families of the killed passengers on the plane that crashed into the Pentagon whether or not it was really a plane that crashed into the building? 9/11 conspiracy theory nut-jobs are disgusting and idiotic.
2007-09-03 02:04:25 · answer #5 · answered by The Interrupter 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
They think that there are facts that americans aren't being told. Maybe bush hired the terrorists, or knew about the attack but purposely didn't do anything about it. They're just beliefs with some evidence, but not a lot of other people believe them.
2007-09-03 02:01:47 · answer #6 · answered by dbzmaniax 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It couldn't possibly be one of the several countries or groups that have openly stated their willingness to kill American civilians, and to lay the blame on people that claim to have done it is just too easy.
No, it must have been a group that has sworn to protect the country and its people.
2007-09-03 01:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by open4one 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
luke f hit the nail right in the head. both sides are telling you their own versions of what happen on sept 11 you just have to weight them both and see which makes more sense. personally i find it unbelievable that 19 men with box cutter knifes were able to beat the entire U.S. defense system.
2007-09-03 02:23:26 · answer #8 · answered by luis s 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
By "conspiracy" no suggestion that no injuries occured at all. But that cause as "origin" have been concealed.
2007-09-03 02:20:46 · answer #9 · answered by Sostie 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The conspiracy nuts can't answer. They are afraid someone is tracking them.
2007-09-03 02:01:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋